I'm also an engineer and I retired from a large aerospace corporation in 2021. I looked into becoming a patent agent some years ago and decided against it. You may decide differently, of course, but here's a bit of what I learned.
I saw three options for working as a patent agent. I could (1) remain with my company and do patent work for them, perhaps in addition to my engineering job, OR (2) I could stay in my engineering job and do patent law as a side hustle, OR (3) I could quit my job and look for full-time patent work. Evaluating these three options, I found...
(1) My company did little or no patent work internally. We farmed it out to external law firms, picking ones with the appropriate expertise for the particular case. My sector of the corporation had over 7,000 engineers and fewer than 10 attorneys, who mostly selected and managed the law firms we hired. There would be virtually no opportunity to work in patent law inside my company.
(2) Practicing patent law as a side hustle would require me to to find and engage my own clients, and given the business hours of likely clients and the PTO it would not be possible to do the job at night and on weekends, and it didn't appear to be something I could do only a few hours a week anyway. In addition, there would always be concerns about conflicts of interest, since I would be reviewing new technology and some of it might have applications to my aerospace company, and things I did in my regular engineering job might bear upon the work of clients. Finally, being a one-man-show in a technology field is very tough, as I would not have personal expertise in the specialties of many of my clients. This would either limit my effectiveness or limit my client selection, or I would have to engage consultants from time to time.
(3) Finding a full-time patent agent gig at a legal firm appeared to be the most practical, much more so than just striking out on my own. But at least at the time I looked into it, job opportunities were few compared to those for engineers. (This could be different now, but I haven't investigated recently.) Furthermore, leaving an engineering job where I was highly experienced and valued to take an entry-level patent job would have cut my salary in half. Experienced patent agents can make decent money, but experienced engineers can make decenter.
So for me it didn't make much sense, and I wasn't really interested in doing patent work full-time anyway. I've always been in love with engineering and didn't particularly want to spend all of my working life creating patents for other people's inventions.
Your viewpoint may be different, of course, and if you're in love with the idea of practicing patent law by all means go for it. If you love what you do, there's a better chance you'll do it very well and succeed.
Just some thoughts on the matter, as you requested.