At least the satanists have sincerely held beliefs. This pastafarian sounds like a true jerk.
Oh, good- religion *AND* politics in one thread. One-stop shopping for the Banhammer.
As to the pastafarian, sounds like he too was engaging in satire.
Yes I was just responding to a post that contrasted the pastafarian to the “Satanists” (satanic temple) as being different when they are in fact both satirists (satirists with firmly held beliefs however).They both are satarical organizations that shame government bodies to remove policies that inject religious activities into government functions.
And to keep this on topic, the Flying Spaghetti Monster would seem to be inherently aviation related, and POA appropriate.
Oh, good- religion *AND* politics in one thread. One-stop shopping for the Banhammer.
So real-life trolls, and likely sociopaths.Yes I was just responding to a post that contrasted the pastafarian to the “Satanists” (satanic temple) as being different when they are in fact both satirists (satirists with firmly held beliefs however).
So real-life trolls, and likely sociopaths.
Protesting something through satire makes you a sociopath does it? They are protesting the presence of the prayer. Last I checked, prayer also isn’t one of the jobs commanded of the government and local municipalities.So real-life trolls, and likely sociopaths.
So real-life trolls, and likely sociopaths.
Such a good point that it is listed first (1st amendment).No, that would be the 'secular humanists'.
These guys have a point. No government body should be in the business of approving a religion.
No, that would be the 'secular humanists'.
These guys have a point. No government body should be in the business of approving a religion.
...allow obviously and intentionally ridiculous parodies of Christianity ...