overhaul lycoming engines

non-revenue use case? no. You won't get full value come prop strike time if that's what you're asking. But refusal to quote, like they do in Florida with roofs? No.
 
What’s your policy say? With the way things are going, I wouldn’t be surprised. It never used to be a factor, as TBO was/is only a recommendation under Part 91.
 
How old is too old? See a lot of planes on market that may be below TBO but haven’t had the cases split in over 20 years some 25-30 years.
 
In a claim situation? Is a 30 year old engine equal in value to a 10 year old engine? No, it isn’t.
 
It may affect the Hull Value. These have been going through the roof in

the last few years. Folks have majored engines which adds to the value

and then find the Hull Premium increases. To me; that’s no a problem.

There are companies that require you to request an increase in the Value;

even if there is no increase in premium.

If you are going to insure at all , it’s important to not be underinsured.

After a certain percentage of Declared Value it becomes their aircraft

in case of damage. Then you won’t even be remotely close to being

able to replace with the payout. A “ Minor “ prop strike can result in

the insurance company owning it. Or, don’t put it through insurance?

Then why have it?
 
We once tried to raise the Hull Value on the insurance of an airplane. The insurance company refused because "the engine was at TBO". Well, they thought the engine recommended TBO was 1800 hrs and could not justify the increased hull value, but in reality the TBO was 2000hrs. That did not matter because yes, we were at TBO 2000hrs. We completed an overhaul a couple years later and also recovered the fabric wings. We went back to the insurance company to raise the Hull Value from $50K to $75K, full market value. They had no issues in doing that.
 
Back
Top