You posted the links, did you even read them????
Every one of your posts attempts to justify this guy hitting these people as a rational choice, an acceptable choice and an acceptable risk supposedly based on other people having successfully done it with out killing someone.
However these people were injured, one fatally, that pilot failed, period. He will pay for his mistake as he should, either via the criminal process if warranted, and/or most likely the civil process.
You can obfuscate, contort, twist however much you want, but you can't change the facts I just stated.
You argue for this pilot's honor, or what ever, but he killed someone , his actions resulted in a death and a serious injury and I see a problem with that. We can learn from that, or we can say hey, no problem, don't judge that guy, you can land on an occupied beach and most of the time you won't kill someone. That seems pretty dumb to me.