Just without any of the money or influence.
It's usually the same author too. Thomas Frank.
In fact, he did an entire series that appears to have been released on the same day in 2014, and is completely full of crap...
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/06/17/small-plane-crashes-investigation/10717427/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...aft-carnage-unfit-for-flight-part-1/10405323/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/06/12/unfit-for-flight-part-2/10405451/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/06/14/unfit-for-flight-part-3/10533813/
Then ran an opinion piece emphasizing that crap a couple weeks later:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...unfit-for-flight-editorials-debates/12118519/
...Before running a piece in 2018 suggesting that private pilots be allowed to use flight-sharing apps and act as "Uber drivers of the sky." Yikes.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...ring-flytenow-uber-mike-lee-column/569753002/
USA Today has no clue when it comes to aviation... Or probably anything else.
You can still buy Bell & Howell branded equipment?!? I didn't know microfilm was still a thing. (OK, their web site shows flashlights, humidifiers, and animal repellers. How the mighty have fallen.)
I bet
@SCCutler could tell a story or three.
Not to mention that they have to keep up the security theater illusion.