aterpster
En-Route
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2011
- Messages
- 3,317
- Display Name
Display name:
aterpster
What information do you have that a change is under consideration?My post edited to not yet
What information do you have that a change is under consideration?My post edited to not yet
https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/fli...ations/20-02-Designated-Mountainous-Areas.pdfWhat information do you have that a change is under consideration?
I haven't been following the Charting Forum for the past few years. It appears to be an air traffic initiative to lower MIAs and MVAs. If it goes anywhere, the science will have to come from Flight Standards or an outside contractor, such as MITRE. The Air Traffic organization has a reputation for being self-serving.https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/fli...ations/20-02-Designated-Mountainous-Areas.pdf
Am I missing something? Did they nix the whole idea?
Yeah. But if ATC can get some more altitude to work with, the users will benefit.I haven't been following the Charting Forum for the past few years. It appears to be an air traffic initiative to lower MIAs and MVAs. If it goes anywhere, the science will have to come from Flight Standards or an outside contractor, such as MITRE. The Air Traffic organization has a reputation for being self-serving.
Yes, if it is safe. First, someone with objective expertise has to prove that the present DMAs are overly conservative.Yeah. But if ATC can get some more altitude to work with, the users will benefit.
https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/fli...ations/20-02-Designated-Mountainous-Areas.pdf
Am I missing something? Did they nix the whole idea?
page 7 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/acf/media/minutes/ACM_20-02_Minutes.pdf
@John Collins , whadda ya know about all this? Where does it stand?