The only OEM V8s in a Scout are the 304 and 345. Some people have swapped in 392s but they weren’t factory.
There were also some anemic 4cyl gas engines that were literally half of one of the other V8s. There was also an underpowered Nissan diesel and in 1980 only a slightly more reasonably powered turbo diesel.
I know
I'm only interested in a 345 or a 392 if I can find a swap or if I find one with a sad motor and rebuild a 392 to put in it. The 392 would be nice for extra torque.
I'm not an engineer, but I play one on TV, so I build a spreadsheet comparing some vehicles by seating, cargo space, wheelbase, length, width, height
I included the F350, my old 2007 Tahoe, the scout and the traveler version, and hilariously enough, my wife i3
thinking about towing and hauling people. the scout 2 is 4 seats (5 with front bench) and 100" wheelbase
the traveler, adds 18" to the wheelbase and matches the Tahoe wheelbase which was fine for towing.
the traveler also gives you a third row option. AND they were fiberglas tops so I could probably find a hardtop in decent condition for this. I've never driven the traveler, so i'm not sure if the change in looks and extra 18" length would "ruin" the experience for me, but it's potentially a car that could help us have fewer cars.
fofr laughs the i3 has the same wheelbase as the base scout 2.
vehicle length width wheelbase seats bed length height
f350 246 80 156 5 78 81
scout traveler 184 70 118 4 or 5 or 6 or 7 79 66
scout ii 166 70 100 4 or 5 61 66
tahoe 202 79 116 7 49 77
i3 158 70 101 4 28 63
Difference vs tahoe
vehicle length width wheelbase seats bed length height
f350 44 1 40 -2 29 4
scout traveler -18 -9 2 -1 30 -11
scout ii -36 -9 -16 -3 12 -11
tahoe 0 0 0 0 0 0
i3 -44 -9 -15 1 -21 -14