- Joined
- May 11, 2010
- Messages
- 20,703
- Location
- Charlotte, NC
- Display Name
Display name:
Snorting his way across the USA
For years I have made prime rib using the oven at 350 for whatever duration it takes to get the internal temperature to get to wherever I want. I wanted to try something different. The subject was broached in a previous prime rib thread, but that was a long time ago. Searing then slow cooking.
The first step was to procure this bad boy, and prep it with some salt and ground pepper:
As you can see, the thermometer looks a little wonky but I have it set so that the needle is pointing straight up when the target temperature of 140 is hit. I know, 140 is high. Why not 130? Simple. a) The other person likes well done and this is an adequate compromise. b) Using a reduced temperature to cook causes less of a temperature rise after you take it out of the oven. As you can see, the bones have been splayed off and tied back on. I hatred that carp but it is what it is. It's how it came.
Secondly, preheat to 450, put the prime rib in, and immediately throttle back to 250. This was about four pounds. Cook time was about 2 1/2 hours.
As you can see there is a nice sear. What's different? For starters, there isn't nearly as much expelled liquid and deformation as there would have been at a straight 350. That means more tenderer, and more juicier. And the ends aren't burnt to the specifications of the NHL.
So the end result was about a perfect medium. Some might classify this as medium rare. I like it more rare than this but it came out better than I expected. Even the haters that have to hatred did not be hatin' no hatred on this prime rib. Basically, this is a prime rib Ceasar salad. Salad with prime rib on top. I know, the prime rib to salad ratio is admittedly low, but I can always pile more prime rib on top if I want.
I forgot to take a gratuitous photo of the rib bones, but I'm usually the one that goes hound dog on them and finishes them off.
I know. I know. I'll answer right now because someone is going to ask anyway. Mr. Arrow, why didn't you do a reverse sear? You know that's the popular craze these days? I know, right. Well, in my mind, the whole point of searing is to lock in the moisture, which is kind of pointless if you do that at the very end. People rant and rave about it but I'm perfectly happy with the forward sear.
The first step was to procure this bad boy, and prep it with some salt and ground pepper:
As you can see, the thermometer looks a little wonky but I have it set so that the needle is pointing straight up when the target temperature of 140 is hit. I know, 140 is high. Why not 130? Simple. a) The other person likes well done and this is an adequate compromise. b) Using a reduced temperature to cook causes less of a temperature rise after you take it out of the oven. As you can see, the bones have been splayed off and tied back on. I hatred that carp but it is what it is. It's how it came.
Secondly, preheat to 450, put the prime rib in, and immediately throttle back to 250. This was about four pounds. Cook time was about 2 1/2 hours.
As you can see there is a nice sear. What's different? For starters, there isn't nearly as much expelled liquid and deformation as there would have been at a straight 350. That means more tenderer, and more juicier. And the ends aren't burnt to the specifications of the NHL.
So the end result was about a perfect medium. Some might classify this as medium rare. I like it more rare than this but it came out better than I expected. Even the haters that have to hatred did not be hatin' no hatred on this prime rib. Basically, this is a prime rib Ceasar salad. Salad with prime rib on top. I know, the prime rib to salad ratio is admittedly low, but I can always pile more prime rib on top if I want.
I forgot to take a gratuitous photo of the rib bones, but I'm usually the one that goes hound dog on them and finishes them off.
I know. I know. I'll answer right now because someone is going to ask anyway. Mr. Arrow, why didn't you do a reverse sear? You know that's the popular craze these days? I know, right. Well, in my mind, the whole point of searing is to lock in the moisture, which is kind of pointless if you do that at the very end. People rant and rave about it but I'm perfectly happy with the forward sear.