I did it for a while.
In terms of practicality, I found the compressed bricks that Tractor Supply sells to produce the most heat with the least effort. They also were the cleanest solution. I took the chimney off to clean it after a winter of using those bricks, and there was nothing to clean. There was little or no visible smoke coming from the chimney, either, once they ignited (which also was much easier than when using logs).
The bricks also were much less-expensive than self-harvested wood if I assigned even a dollar an hour to my own labor. I forget the exact price, but they were pretty cheap by the pallet. They were more expensive than purchased cordwood by bulk, but probably pretty close on a BTU / dollar basis.
Environmentally, I don't buy the argument that burning wood is "carbon neutral" because the carbon was sequestrated in the tree. The same can be said of the carbon in petroleum if you widen the time scale. As I see it, what is being released now is what matters, not when or how it got into the fuel in the first place. Nonetheless, I suspect that the bricks emit much less carbon than logs simply because there's little or no smoke. That's not very scientific, I know. But it seems sensible. More complete combustion should produce less atmospheric carbon.
I've thought about installing a wood stove in this place, but it's too much work for too little benefit. Propane and electric oil-filled radiators do the job just fine at a low cost. Unless I have guests, I heat the house to about 55 F with the propane and the rooms we're sitting or sleeping in to about 68 F with the oil-filled heaters. I pre-buy the propane in May or June to get the best price, so my combined total heating costs usually come out to between $2,000.00 and $3,000.00 / year. I doubt I'd ever recover the investment in a wood stove at that rate.
Rich