Mtns2Skies
Final Approach
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2008
- Messages
- 5,631
- Display Name
Display name:
Mtns2Skies
I own Skywagon that does *almost* everything I want, but I have the opportunity to rent something that supplements my aviation needs. I have the opportunity to solo rent a Seneca that's about 45 minutes from my home, or a 180 on amphibs that's an hour and a half from home. Realistically I only have the time and money to be proficient and safe to have one of these as +1 to my plane, but I'm not sure which as the missions couldn't be more different. The price between the two is just about the same.
I see big benefits to either of them, there are several trips I have coming up that would benefit from a twin, either going over the great lakes or the increased speed. Multi's are also cool as hell and building twin time is valuable.
On the flip side Seaplane flying is the most fun I've ever had, certainly with pants on and perhaps even with them off. Some fantastic camping trips can be had via the seaplane that I otherwise couldn't do with mine.
What says the peanut gallery?
I see big benefits to either of them, there are several trips I have coming up that would benefit from a twin, either going over the great lakes or the increased speed. Multi's are also cool as hell and building twin time is valuable.
On the flip side Seaplane flying is the most fun I've ever had, certainly with pants on and perhaps even with them off. Some fantastic camping trips can be had via the seaplane that I otherwise couldn't do with mine.
What says the peanut gallery?