Mick Galvin
Filing Flight Plan
Howdy - where would be the best/appropriate place to ask a VOR related FAA written test question? Looking for help with VOR cone of confusion issues... Cheers!
-mick
-mick
This is one critical part I'm missing. Clearly the image shows no to / from so how do I (aircraft) end up on the 120/300 radial?you are missing a to/from meaning you are on the 120/300 radial.
OK. I think I see what I'm missing. If I'm in the "cone" area, the VOR is still showing a valid location of me relative to the selected radial but doesn't know if I'm from or to? And as a result, it implies I'm perpendicular to the radial? And given the direction of offset to the radial, I can figure which side of perpendicular to?
-mick
OK. I think I see what I'm missing. If I'm in the "cone" area, the VOR is still showing a valid location of me relative to the selected radial but doesn't know if I'm from or to? And as a result, it implies I'm perpendicular to the radial? And given the direction/side of offset to the radial, I can figure which side of perpendicular I'm at?
-mick
I've used that a number of times but from what I've seen, it doesn't ever simulate being in the cone of confusion ie it always wants the reading to be accurate.http://www.luizmonteiro.com/learning_vor_sim.aspx Set up any situation you want here.
Right. This is the point that I was missing. Somehow I had it in my head that the absence of the TO/FROM was an indication of being in the cone and given what I initially wrote "I thought the VOR was totally unreliable when the to/from was missing.", I came to a brick wall with the questions. But I'm confident with things now that I've separated the two concepts ie cone and missing TO/FROM are not the same. Again, thanks everyone.In the FAA questions like that one, you’re just at the cross over point from TO to FROM. You’re not in the cone at all.
I think this is the y...it's not that the TO/FROM flag wouldn't show up, its that they chose to simplify the question by not showing it. They only want to know which side of the 030/210 line you're on.The question is set up to be To/From irrelevant. The needle is deflected in a way that indicates the heading that will intercept the dialed in course is to the northwest - look at the numbers where the needle is deflected. That places you southeast.
VOR reading is one of the very first areas in avionics reading where the methodology used for teaching it is much, much more complicated than actually using the equipment in flight. My recommendation, as always, is a one-on-one with a CFI who understands it well enough to simplify it.
OK. I think I see what I'm missing. If I'm in the "cone" area, the VOR is still showing a valid location of me relative to the selected radial but doesn't know if I'm from or to? And as a result, it implies I'm perpendicular to the radial? And given the direction/side of offset to the radial, I can figure which side of perpendicular I'm at?
-mick
I think this is the y...it's not that the TO/FROM flag wouldn't show up, its that they chose to simplify the question by not showing it. They only want to know which side of the 030/210 line you're on.
Yeah. If the question was about the 'Cone' I'm sure it would have showed the Off Flag
I think the OP's confusion is largely stemming from thinking that the TO/FROM flag, or lack thereof, is relevant to the question in any way. It's not.For an official question, maybe. In real life, the thing just goes stupid for a bit, usually. Never seen an OFF flag from flying into the actual RF silent cone, because there’s usually still a little bit of RF signal there.
If you fly over the station perfectly dead center, it’ll indicate a perfect straight up needle, then go insane for a number of seconds, then back to a perfect straight up needle with a flag flip.
Never seen anyone center punch the VOR so well they get an OFF.
Probably a bit receiver specific too. My TO/FROM flag on King stuff takes its own sweet time to flip.
I think its safe to say that while I thought my problem was with the cone, my real problem was not fully understanding abeam - just as you wrote. The post #14 diagram had been drawn for me by my CFI but @dmspilot 's version had one subtle item that helped me get my head in order and that was the perpendicular line being dashed with the blank/off reference. For whatever reason, that helped fix my thinking.@dmspilot 's diagram in post #14 and understanding the To/From indicator is going to change when you are 'abeam' the station even when you are far from it
I think this is the y...it's not that the TO/FROM flag wouldn't show up, its that they chose to simplify the question by not showing it. They only want to know which side of the 030/210 line you're on.
I think its safe to say that while I thought my problem was with the cone, my real problem was not fully understanding abeam - just as you wrote. The post #14 diagram had been drawn for me by my CFI but @dmspilot 's version had one subtle item that helped me get my head in order and that was the perpendicular line being dashed with the blank/off reference. For whatever reason, that helped fix my thinking.
I'm currently scoring 98->100% in many sections of my test software, just trying to plug some holes and this was a good one. My bad for dragging this knowledge stuff out as far as I have since when I'm done with the test, I'm then able to take my helicopter check ride!
This isn't ignoring an OFF flag...there is no OFF flag.Disagree. They've done it on purpose, because the flag is actually off. They're not "choosing to simplify the question by not showing it". I've gone over every single written question on VORs on the current test while teaching groundschool. You will not get the correct answer on some of the questions by ignoring an off flag.
This isn't ignoring an OFF flag...there is no OFF flag.
Disagree. They've done it on purpose, because the flag is actually off. They're not "choosing to simplify the question by not showing it". I've gone over every single written question on VORs on the current test while teaching groundschool. You will not get the correct answer on some of the questions by ignoring an off flag.
Got a picture or reference? I've never seen one like that.
Either way, an OFF flag or blank TO/FROM indicates an unusable signal, not that you're abeam the course.Some indicators are blank in lieu of a flag that shows "off". They are the same thing. If there's no to or from, it's an off flag.
Either way, an OFF flag or blank TO/FROM indicates an unusable signal, not that you're abeam the course.
So what corrections do you make based on VOR indication when the OFF flag is showing?No it doesn't. In order for what you wrote to be true, the flag would have to change instantaneously, and everyone knows that doesn't happen.
So what corrections do you make based on VOR indication when the OFF flag is showing?
...which of course, is irrelevant to the question since (a) there is no "off" flag, and (b) "who the heck knows? There's no reliable signal" isn't one if the multiple guess answers.So what corrections do you make based on VOR indication when the OFF flag is showing?
Exactly my point....which of course, is irrelevant to the question since (a) there is no "off" flag, and (b) "who the heck knows? There's no reliable signal" isn't one if the multiple guess answers.
Thought so. Just picked your post out of the subthread.Exactly my point.
Which is why so many people think the written test is a waste of time...people intentionally remove or add context to make the questions irrelevant.You don't make corrections. But you can use it to determine your position for the purpose of the written test.