Matthew K
Line Up and Wait
https://www.wspa.com/news/plane-cra...airport-multiple-injuries-reported/1479795027
Apparently ran off the runway.
Apparently ran off the runway.
The story doesn't note whether this is a takeoff or a landing accident. Will be interesting to see.~5500' is no sweat for a Falcon 50, assuming you're on speed....
The story doesn't note whether this is a takeoff or a landing accident. Will be interesting to see.
Edit: it looks as if the T/Rs are deployed, but still could be an RTO or overrun.
The story doesn't note whether this is a takeoff or a landing accident. Will be interesting to see.
Edit: it looks as if the T/Rs are deployed, but still could be an RTO or overrun.
Buckets aren’t out on the port side.......
This, and it doesn't seem to work that well either.Three engined falcons only have t/r's on the #2 engine
That's a pretty bold rumor to be spreading without reliable evidence. Probably best to refrain from the rumor mill on this one.Rumour is that the SIC was only a VFR private pilot, and the PIC was either not typed or freshly out of school.
Ouch. That ditch and berm was not helpful. They hit hard and fast it looks like. That nose looks partially bent down before the section that got shoved up into the cockpit. Major wrinkle under the #2.
Rumour is that the SIC was only a VFR private pilot, and the PIC was either not typed or freshly out of school.
That's a pretty bold rumor to be spreading without reliable evidence. Probably best to refrain from the rumor mill on this one.
Well, it's at least half true. Here's the SIC - Private ASMEL, no IR. I guess since he's not the captain, he technically doesn't need an IR to go in the flight levels, but it's incredibly rare to have that happen with someone with ratings that low.
STEPHEN GEORGE FOX
Address is not available
Medical Information:
Medical Class: Second Medical Date: 3/2017
MUST WEAR CORRECTIVE LENSES.
BasicMed Course Date: None BasicMed CMEC Date: None
Certificates
PRIVATE PILOT
And only flying on a third class medical to boot, not that it makes a difference since he is not a commercial pilot. This one will be interesting to follow.
You need your IFR to be sic on an aircraft that requires an sic and is operating ifr.
Issued 3/17. Beyond 1year from issue.Where do you get that? It says Second under Medical Class.
Issued 3/17. Beyond 1year from issue.
Well, it's at least half true. Here's the SIC - Private ASMEL, no IR. I guess since he's not the captain, he technically doesn't need an IR to go in the flight levels, but it's incredibly rare to have that happen with someone with ratings that low.
STEPHEN GEORGE FOX
Address is not available
Medical Information:
Medical Class: Second Medical Date: 3/2017
MUST WEAR CORRECTIVE LENSES.
BasicMed Course Date: None BasicMed CMEC Date: None
Certificates
PRIVATE PILOT
PRIVATE PILOT(FOREIGN BASED)
Certificates Description
Certificate: PRIVATE PILOT
Date of Issue: 3/17/2010
Ratings:
PRIVATE PILOT
AIRPLANE SINGLE ENGINE LAND
AIRPLANE MULTIENGINE LAND
Limits:
ENGLISH PROFICIENT.
But that ATP wouldn’t be valid for a U.S.-registered aircraft being flown in the U.S.He has a Foreign-Based Certificate which can only be given at the FAA Private Level. He could very well hold an ATP from his home ICAO State.
Per the FAA database for the other pilot, John Caswell:
Certificate: AIRLINE TRANSPORT PILOT
Date of Issue: 3/5/2016
Ratings:
AIRLINE TRANSPORT PILOT
AIRPLANE MULTIENGINE LAND
COMMERCIAL PRIVILEGES
AIRPLANE SINGLE ENGINE LAND
Type Ratings:
A/DA-50 A/G-1159 A/LR-JET
Limits:
ENGLISH PROFICIENT.
DA-50 SIC PRIVILEGES ONLY.
Just keeps getting deeper. Next question is who owned the airplane and who was in the back. Was this a Part 134 1/2 charter?
Definitely will be interesting to see what kind of operation this was. I can't see the right seater being a private pilot and being legal in any way unless he owned the airplane, and he still needed an instrument rating.
But, the airplane was based in South Florida, and nothing that comes out of there is a surprise to me.
Unless it's about a serial killer; then it begins, "A Seattle man ..."So many strange news stories begin with “A Florida man...”
Just keeps getting deeper. Next question is who owned the airplane and who was in the back. Was this a Part 134 1/2 charter?
That is what I was thinking. Not many circumstances would legally place a private pilot in the right seat of a two pilot jet unless he owned it. Any other way there would compensation to be considered, whether financial or the flight time.
The insurance company will be quick to jump on this one I'm sure. If it is indeed what it appears to be initially, no way was this operation covered by the insurance, if there even was any.
134 1/2 ???
134 1/2 ???
Slang for illegal charter
Yes, as in almost Part 135 charter, but not.
But that ATP wouldn’t be valid for a U.S.-registered aircraft being flown in the U.S.
It is a South Florida jet operation......Just keeps getting deeper. Next question is who owned the airplane and who was in the back. Was this a Part 134 1/2 charter?