PeterNSteinmetz
Ejection Handle Pulled
Apparently a demo flight.
https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/l...again/63-775ca2dd-e5d0-4613-b43f-d32466fa0926
https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/l...again/63-775ca2dd-e5d0-4613-b43f-d32466fa0926
call me jaded, but given Icon's marketing and the type of person they sell to I would say this is doubtfulI wonder if he got permission
If they get a call, they have to respond. All it takes is one Nervous Nelly to dial 911.The demo pilot was on the local news last night. Seems like a reasonable guy. They are operating out of KCPS, so it'd be a much bigger story if he ignored the tower! Also, apparently fire and police responded two days in a row. Are they idiots or just bored?
I'm pretty sure they could get a park ranger to look east and see if there is a plane crashed in the river vs bringing three police vehicles and two fire trucks.If they get a call, they have to respond. All it takes is one Nervous Nelly to dial 911.
Well, Nelly IS from the Lou...If they get a call, they have to respond. All it takes is one Nervous Nelly to dial 911.
Oh my goodness!!! I've seen several planes go down today. They all seem to be crashing near the airport!!! I even saw a helicopter crash on the hospital!!! SEND HELP!!!
I can easily see how this can happen, especially if water landings are very rare in that area. A non-aviation knowledgeable person sees a plane land on the water. It must be a ditching!If they get a call, they have to respond. All it takes is one Nervous Nelly to dial 911.
I’ve had police called landing my hang glider on XC flights. I had a good laugh with one who seemed disappointed that I wasn’t hurt. I told him I’d try harder next time.
I'm pretty sure they could get a park ranger to look east and see if there is a plane crashed in the river vs bringing three police vehicles and two fire trucks.
call me jaded, but given Icon's marketing and the type of person they sell to I would say this is doubtful
To be frank, I don't think they are much different from Cirrus in both respects. They are both attentively marketing to high net worth folks that want to feel what they are buying is something special.
Both planes are actually pretty impressive products, so there's some legitimacy to all of this imo.
Only thing is when people got themselves into trouble in cirrus planes at a high rate, cirrus changed their tune, marketing and training.
Icon is still marketing their planes like an ATV to low to no time pilots, and unlike cirrus sells a fixed gear non backcountry plane, icon is selling amphibs.
Call them up first and notify them of the intended river landing and that you are in contact with ATC. Same as when burning brush on my farm - call the sheriff first and let him know it's a controlled, planned burn.
I can easily see how this can happen, especially if water landings are very rare in that area. A non-aviation knowledgeable person sees a plane land on the water. It must be a Crash!
Rick emphasizes, his pilot followed all the right protocols, including getting permission from air traffic control.
“We followed all the right procedures, had clearance from the tower and we’re just trying to have fun,” he said.
Call them up first and notify them of the intended river landing and that you are in contact with ATC. Same as when burning brush on my farm - call the sheriff first and let him know it's a controlled, planned burn.
Do you need permission to land on a river within D airspace?Looks like he was inside the class delta for a local airport. I wonder if he got permission.
One drugged up guy, whose father is a pilot, who had plenty of hours and owned a Caravan, certainly isn't the supposed Icon demo of "non-pilot with money". The other fatal Icon crash involved a box canyon and an Icon demo pilot.Well, if the high profile accidents haven't tempered Icon's promotional approach, they are slow learners indeed.
Do you need permission to land on a river within D airspace?
Do you need permission to land on a river within D airspace?
No aircraft activity within D airspace, save landing at the airport, requires ATC approval.Doesn't D airspace go to the surface? I would think that all aircraft activity within D would need ATC approval.
My instructor would have said, "Are you asking them or telling them?" And then make me tell them:Just 2 way communication to enter the airspace, they don’t control the water. Probably smart to let them know what you’re doing so they don’t think you’re ditching in the river
“Podunk tower, amphib 1232 is 8 to the Southwest 1500’, looking to enter your airspace for take off and landings on the river by XYZ location”
I normally use Amphib vs Cessna for my call sign, so if I divert to a lake or something ATC is less likely to freak out and start asking souls on board and all lol
My instructor would have said, "Are you asking them or telling them?" And then make me tell them:
“Podunk tower, amphib 1232 is 8 to the Southwest 1500’, will be landing on the river by XYZ location.”
No aircraft activity within D airspace, save landing at the airport, requires ATC approval.
No aircraft activity within D airspace, save landing at the airport, requires ATC approval.
I believe there can be exceptions to that. My first flying job was operating from a grass strip. There was a line of trees around the perimeter of the property so you couldn't see there was a strip in there if you were outside the property. A major highway passed about a mile east of the field.If they get a call, they have to respond. All it takes is one Nervous Nelly to dial 911.
You only have to follow ATC instructions if ATC gives you instructions.I will need to review the regs on that as I thought one had to follow ATC instructions within any airspace they controlled.
Me: "Tower, Bugsmasher 123AB"Not what i was taught during my PPL. Which was a few months ago. You need to establish 2 way comms with the tower prior to entering the Delta. I have personally heard over the radio 2 different pilots get deviations from not doing this.