Before everyone gets too excited about telling the OP it can be done, how is the Husky equipped? It is probably fine but nobody here is going to have the answer unless they know the plane in question.
There's a minimum equipment list to usa an airplane for training? And beatup, 40 year old C152s with a single Nav/Com meet it, but you're worried that a Husky won't?
It’s probably better equipped than some of the jets I've flown.Can you complete all the tasks necessary on the private pilot checkride in it?
Some airplanes you can’t.
It’s probably better equipped than some of the jets I've flown.
At least, that’s been my experience with Huskies.
Worse comes to worse, an electric T&B is cheap and easy to install, and they’re allowing hand-held nav for the Private Checkride, I think.That’s been my experience as well. But it is something to be considered.
Can you complete all the tasks necessary on the private pilot checkride in it?
Some airplanes you can’t.
Valid point. And something to verify in any particular airplane.
But when one looks at any given year every Husky seems to be equipped similarly, for the era. They have always been a somewhat expensive (for what they are, imo) and well equipped plane when new. The older ones are all 180 hp, constant speed prop, with vacuum systems and a more than adequate panel for VFR training.
The new ones have a fuel injected 200 hp option, glitzy paint and the now mandatory swaths of glass imbedded in the panel. Any of them are probably more exciting to train in than the common well-used vintage 172.
My 1996 has more in it than I would prefer, all King state-of-the art circa mid-1990s. It even has a moving map King GPS. Talk about ambitious. I am considering stripping out some of the stuff to lighten it up, as it's a purely day VFR plane for me.
I think if one is fortunate to train in a Husky it's going to be hard to step back to something with more sedate performance.
OxymoronI agree with everything you said. I’ve never seen a minimally equipped husky either but with the type of flying huskies and similar airplanes are often associated with I would be less surprised to see one stripped of extra equipment than I would to find a stripped 150 or something like that. That’s the only reason I even mentioned it.
And in case someone doesn’t believe that people would remove equipment from an airplane, I’m doing a panel upgrade in a Super Cub right now which includes removing the vacuum system and all gyros. The “upgrade” wouldn’t have enough equipment to do a private checkride. The goal is to make the plane as light and simple as possible to maximize performance.
Except for the Husky’s propensity to land on the taxiway. *cough* Harrison Ford *cough*.
Really, the Jar Jar Binks avatar is giving Han Solo grief??
I know students who started in a twin....you can learn to fly in anything, even a jet if you'd like. Of course the insurance is outlandish....
Here's my favorite entry in the airmen database....brownie points if you know who it is
Medical Class: First Medical Date: 2/2019
MUST WEAR CORRECTIVE LENSES FOR NEAR AND DISTANT VISION.
Certificate: PRIVATE PILOT
Date of Issue: 12/28/2018
Ratings:
PRIVATE PILOT
AIRPLANE SINGLE ENGINE LAND
AIRPLANE MULTIENGINE LAND
INSTRUMENT AIRPLANE
Type Ratings:
P/B-707 P/B-720 P/CE-500 P/CL-600 P/DA-2000
P/EA-500S P/G-1159 P/HS-125 P/LR-JET
Limits:
ENGLISH PROFICIENT.
B-707 DA-2000 SIC PRIVILEGES ONLY.
AUTHORIZED EXPERIMENTAL AIRCRAFT: SO-G2.
CE-500 (VFR ONLY).
Give Mark a call http://www.aviationservicesdirectory.com/company/afton_flight_services/4815Since then I moved and now live in Wyoming and the Aviat factory is literally 30 min driving distance.
I'm about to fit an MVP-50P to my Super Decathlon so interested in reviews. (I still part-own a Pitts and regularly fly and instruct in a Husky.)The Husky that I'll be flying in is actually a new 2018 A1C with a pretty nice set of equipment including a G796 touch-screen GPS with MVP-50 digital engine monitor.