MooneyDriver78
En-Route
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2013
- Messages
- 4,692
- Display Name
Display name:
Tom
IIRC, metallic paint requires a clear coat, but regular paint doesn’t.
All good information. It's a Grumman, so I'm mentally adding $5K on top of whatever it would cost to paint a 172, due to the bonded construction. I'm tied down in the Hudson Valley - less UV from the sun, but lots of snow/ice in the winter.
I did not say they should not own or fly! My point was, worrying about the appearance and saleability of a paint job of a plane kept in the elements is rather ephemeral compared to factors like corrosion that are MUCH more concerning.Frankly I'm surprised nobody has brought up the whole what can an owner legally paint topic up
Most people that don't have a hangar aren't outside by choice. Some places there's years long waiting lists. So they're not supposed to fly just cuz its not inside? Invest in some covers and do more thorough pre flight and go fly
Was that a complete strip job with control surfaces removed?
I wouldn't be afraid of a scuff and shoot under the right circumstances. If the old paint is adhering well and its properly prepared so the new stuff sticks to it its a viable option. How much does paint weigh, ~15lbs a gallon?
White on all horizontal surfaces. Only use color on vertical which receives less UV/unit area. Or just look a autos: metallics are pretty but really look bad after a while. Aircraft paint is automotive paint.Which ones are the best?
Outside in the Las Vegas sun. Paint is now 5 years old. Annual wax and quarterly washes. Looks ‘almost’ like fresh paint. Hangars here are 700+ pm so 2 years of hangar rental is the same as a fresh paint join.