John Baker
Final Approach
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2008
- Messages
- 7,471
- Location
- San Diego, California
- Display Name
Display name:
John Baker
I fly a Piper Cherokee Warrior. When announcing myself, I always refer to my bird as a Cherokee. I have had instructors refer to it as a Piper, and one friend called it in as a Warrior.
My thinking is that what you call your plane should be what is most descriptive of what you are flying. When I hear someone refer to themselves as a Piper, I start looking for a yellow high wing, or just a high wing. Cherokee, most every pilot knows, is a low wing. Warrior just sounds pretentious to me, like saying "tally ho" instead of "traffic in sight"
What I'm wondering is, is my thinking correct, should you call in what best describes you to anyone who might be looking for you, such as someone in the pattern, or should you call in as what you actually are?
If you home build some obscure airplane that looks like a Cessna, should you identify yourself a a Cessna so everyone will know what to look for, or whatever you actually are?
What do you do?
John
My thinking is that what you call your plane should be what is most descriptive of what you are flying. When I hear someone refer to themselves as a Piper, I start looking for a yellow high wing, or just a high wing. Cherokee, most every pilot knows, is a low wing. Warrior just sounds pretentious to me, like saying "tally ho" instead of "traffic in sight"
What I'm wondering is, is my thinking correct, should you call in what best describes you to anyone who might be looking for you, such as someone in the pattern, or should you call in as what you actually are?
If you home build some obscure airplane that looks like a Cessna, should you identify yourself a a Cessna so everyone will know what to look for, or whatever you actually are?
What do you do?
John