Bacho
Pre-takeoff checklist
I am a new owner of a 172G, I am exploring my ADS-B options as well as considering an IFR GPS. So far I have not found the 175 as an approved position source for an ADS-B transponder. Is there something I am missing?
There is a minimum TSO they have to meet.
Ok, so this list is exclusive correct?
Its not the complete list of GPS sources that would qualify but probably the most common you’d see in a GA fleet.
Also certainly up to the manufacturer of the device receiving the GPS data if they want to put limitations on it and what they submitted for approval for their paperwork.
The doc is from February. If you had some other GPS source in mind, you could always call Appareo and ask. I don’t think anything significant has been released this year other than the Garmin that already has the ADS-B stuff built in.
The GTX 335 transponder has GPS but I don't think it can be the source for the Appaero.Its not the complete list of GPS sources that would qualify but probably the most common you’d see in a GA fleet.
Also certainly up to the manufacturer of the device receiving the GPS data if they want to put limitations on it and what they submitted for approval for their paperwork.
The doc is from February. If you had some other GPS source in mind, you could always call Appareo and ask. I don’t think anything significant has been released this year other than the Garmin that already has the ADS-B stuff built in.
And the 175 is on the list"These are the FAA approved ADS-B Out / GPS combinations for certified aircraft: https://www.faa.gov/nextgen/equipadsb/installation/equipment/
Now, one could conceivably strike out on their own and get approval for other combinations following the guidance of Advisory Circular AC 20-165B in addition to other "hoop jumping."
I had the 335 installed a couple years ago, the G5 a couple months ago. Use the same GPS antenna. The A&P who installed the G5 checked the installation manual, and the RS232 goes to the G5. As for the 175....that requires a second GPS antenna, as per the avionics shop on the field.Something you might check into is if the 175 can use the position data from a GTX 335. I have a 335 (with its own WAAS antenna) with a stub out RS-232 pair and hope to one day use for a G5.
Could the RS232 feed a 175?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
there is no reason a IFR approved WAAS GPS cant be a position source
I am a new owner of a 172G, I am exploring my ADS-B options as well as considering an IFR GPS. So far I have not found the 175 as an approved position source for an ADS-B transponder. Is there something I am missing?
What transponder specifically?
You could just hook the existing gps antenna to the 175 and RS232 our from the 175 as position for the 335. The 335 can either use internal gps or an external position source. Same result, but a different way to get there.Something you might check into is if the 175 can use the position data from a GTX 335. I have a 335 (with its own WAAS antenna) with a stub out RS-232 pair and hope to one day use for a G5.
Could the RS232 feed a 175?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I am a new owner of a 172G, I am exploring my ADS-B options as well as considering an IFR GPS. So far I have not found the 175 as an approved position source for an ADS-B transponder. Is there something I am missing?
Let say you have a GPS-175, and a GNC-255. Is there enough communication between the two that the GNC-255 will auto tune an ILS if you have an ILS programmed into the GPS-175?
My guess is hes pushing for a 430/530 because he know it. As i have said 1k times, it makes no sense to do a 430/530 as a new install. its been out of production for 8 years, is 20 year old technology and im guessing most of the stuff inside is not available anymore. its reaching EOL rapidly. all the signs are there garmin offered good upgrade pricing to owners, they have raised the repair prices, and have been buying them back. next is sorry charley its not repairable anymore. spend a few bucks more and buy a in production unit.I bought a stratus ESG from Jim. A product I could install myself was a big deal.
as far as the GPS goes, its a little on the back burner. My CFI pushing hard for the 430w or 530w, I am not that convinced on spending that amount of coin on such an old product. It seems to be nearly a wash just to buy a current GPS offering and an older Nav radio.
2 reasons off the cuff: panel space and screen size.Maybe I need a new thread. Still considering a new GPS/Nav radio. Pretty much torn between a used gtn 650 or a 175/used SL30. Kinda leaning towards the 175/sl30. A little cheaper and gets some redundancy. Is there a reason I should not go that route?
The 355 is GPSand Com, but no Nav radio. The only reason not to do the 175/SL30 route is two separate CDI’s.
You could just hook the existing gps antenna to the 175 and RS232 our from the 175 as position for the 335. The 335 can either use internal gps or an external position source. Same result, but a different way to get there.
Sounds like a 375 would be the obvious choice.
I agreed wholeheartedly with those who suggested a 375 as the obvious choice to the OP last year but how would that apply to me NordicDave? If you were indeed referring to "my situation?" Did you read my post? Yeah! I know it was a bit long but I try hard not to waste many words.The GNX-375 is the no-brained solution. ADSB In/Out and WAAS GPS. @Bacho, Brilliant solution made for exactly your situation.
Unfortunately they did have a reason for that choice. I've worked with a number of "approved" GPS and "approved" transponder solutions that, when integrated together, did NOT meet the timing/latency requirements.Such a shame the FAA couldn't just say that if a position source is certified with any OUT device, it is certified to use with all OUT devices. Then it would just be a matter of ensuring the GPS sentence complies with the standard. This would be simple, practical, and economical.
There is no reason you can’t just install another gps antenna, but that adds time and cost, and it adds another antenna on the top of your plane. If it was me I would connect the GA35 to the 355 and send position data to the 335. The 3d5 can send pressure altitude to the 355, but I don’t think the WAAS Gps needs pressure altitude. The old non-waas units did, but the waas units don’t, iirc. The manual should show the preferred wiring. I don’t think the GAE12 will mount to the 355. It will to the 375, not the 355 (again, iirc).
on a side note, if the king Nav/com has a glideslope indicator, you can probably hook hat indicator to the 355 and save the cost of the GI106.
I agreed wholeheartedly with those who suggested a 375 as the obvious choice to the OP last year but how would that apply to me NordicDave? If you were indeed referring to "my situation?" Did you read my post? Yeah! I know it was a bit long but I try hard not to waste many words.
Just to recap, I've already recently installed a very nice GTX335 ADS-B OUT transponder that I'm quite happy with. I get my traffic and weather on an ipad with Stratus and FF.
My plan is to replace an existing legacy King NAV/COM with a new generation GPS/COM ...and also get rid of an old un-updatable gps.
Any help with my questions would be appreciated. ZT
There is no reason you can’t just install another gps antenna, but that adds time and cost, and it adds another antenna on the top of your plane. If it was me I would connect the GA35 to the 355 and send position data to the 335. The 3d5 can send pressure altitude to the 355, but I don’t think the WAAS Gps needs pressure altitude. The old non-waas units did, but the waas units don’t, iirc. The manual should show the preferred wiring. I don’t think the GAE12 will mount to the 355. It will to the 375, not the 355 (again, iirc).
on a side note, if the king Nav/com has a glideslope indicator, you can probably hook hat indicator to the 355 and save the cost of the GI106.
Yeah! I can see why a SEL flashing could be disturbing! Do you expect this issue to be resolved?I tried installing GTX-345 with internal GPS receiver without it being attached to a GPS and it constantly flashed "service soon" IDK if you would have the same experience, at that time Garmin tech support said there was no way to disable that even though it was being provided position via a GTN.
My question here is the same one I asked Jesse above... What altitude will the GNC355 for IFR approaches if there is no pressure altitude available to the GNC355?I wouldn't worry about the uncorrected baro to the 355. If you get a Garmin G5 later I think that wold get it corrected baro.