I am okay with Boeing owning them. There are likely more than a few features that I now rely on that are here sooner because Boeing funded the R&D.I just wish Boeing had not bought them.
I agree but why did they change to reloading the entire database, (or so it seems) for updates? What used to be a five minute event is now around 30-45 minutes.
Next time it will time it.What do you mean? I just now upgraded to 13.5 in a couple of minutes. It's not reloading the entire database. Unless I'm misunderstanding what you're saying.
I don’t see 13.5 as an option.
I don’t see 13.5 as an option.
Nor do I.
Go into the app store, type in foreflight, it should show up in a few seconds, did for me.
it just gives me the option to open my current edition, not update to 13.5
I just wish Boeing had not bought them. I think that will ruin the company.
No, pretty good actually....I did the update. I dunno, first flight out it was telling me I was on the verge of stalling and needed to lower the nose.
Too soon?
It may be due to your version of IOS. Some of the FF updates will not run on an older IOS, and a newer IOS cannot be loaded on an older device. I can't get the newer version on my phone, because it is an older model.it just gives me the option to open my current edition, not update to 13.5
I don't know about Foreflight but earlier this year the FAA Changed how they release Sectional Charts from every 6 months to every 56 days so that every time you get a new cycle you have to download every sectional from the FAA. Foreflight may just be tracking that data directly instead of generating smaller differential updates.I agree but why did they change to reloading the entire database, (or so it seems) for updates? What used to be a five minute event is now around 30-45 minutes.
I don’t see 13.5 as an option.
I missed the joke. Would you explain? You know where I’m from so don’t use big words.I did the update. I dunno, first flight out it was telling me I was on the verge of stalling and needed to lower the nose.
Too soon?
737 MAXI missed the joke. Would you explain? You know where I’m from so don’t use big words.
Aaahhh. Thank you737 MAX
It won't drive the autopilot around the hold, though, so I'm not sure it would be all that useful for IFR. But to be fair, I haven't tried it, because my GTN supports holds (as does Avidyne's IFD series).The holding pattern if you have, say, a GNS which does not let you do them in the navigator. You can even do an offset hold, like "hold west of the 10 mile fix on..."
Thats true. But I wasn't even thinking of the AP piece. After all, even a GTN and IFD can't drive a legacy autopilot without GPSS around a hold.It won't drive the autopilot around the hold, though, so I'm not sure it would be all that useful for IFR. But to be fair, I haven't tried it, because my GTN supports holds (as does Avidyne's IFD series).
I agree but why did they change to reloading the entire database, (or so it seems) for updates? What used to be a five minute event is now around 30-45 minutes.
I'm not sure what happened, but my last update was really long. I'm not talking about updating to 13.5 (my version is still 13.4.1). The data download, new charts and other data, was a lot longer. This was just last Saturday. Other internet things seemed normal.What do you mean? I just now upgraded to 13.5 in a couple of minutes. It's not reloading the entire database. Unless I'm misunderstanding what you're saying.
I'm not sure what happened, but my last update was really long. I'm not talking about updating to 13.5 (my version is still 13.4.1). The data download, new charts and other data, was a lot longer. This was just last Saturday.
With the GFC and GTN combo, one can get spoiled quickly to letting George fly the holdsIt won't drive the autopilot around the hold, though, so I'm not sure it would be all that useful for IFR. But to be fair, I haven't tried it, because my GTN supports holds (as does Avidyne's IFD series).
Thats true. But I wasn't even thinking of the AP piece. After all, even a GTN and IFD can't drive a legacy autopilot without GPSS around a hold.
That's why I mentioned the GNS specifically. It would be interesting to see if a FlightStream connection will lead the GNS to create something it can't - paint a random hold - but I doubt it. OTOH, given all the difficulties folks have with holds, the situational awareness it provides will be a huge help for the HDG-NAV-HDG-NAV sequence.
So what's the preferred model of iPad these days for ForeFlight? I have been out of the loop for a while and my last iPad died a couple years ago. Might get a new one.
I would think it can. It looks like it just creates several points for the turns. I will try with my gfc500 and gnx375 this weekend. I know if I draw random points on FF and send to the 375 it will fly whatever I created.
Your 375 can create holds. You can do exactly what Foreflight does on your 375 without Foreflight, so I expect it will work. A GNS series navigator cannot.That's why I mentioned the GNS specifically. It would be interesting to see if a FlightStream connection will lead the GNS to create something it can't - paint a random hold -
Apple is supposed to be coming out with a new mini in the fall, so you may want to wait.I think probably most use the mini. That's what I use. Easier to mount if you want to mount it.
No kidding. I still have the Piper autopilot, but the g5 gives me gpss. Even without knowing the winds the GTN compensates for them and does a FAR better job than I can. It's fun to watch it make adjustments on each lap.With the GFC and GTN combo, one can get spoiled quickly to letting George fly the holds
Update. I came across a post from @John Collins indicating that the new holding function is not currently supported by FlightStream and that even if it did, the receiving GPS would need to support holds.It would be interesting to see if a FlightStream connection will lead the GNS to create something it can't - paint a random hold - but I doubt it. OTOH, given all the difficulties folks have with holds, the situational awareness it provides will be a huge help for the HDG-NAV-HDG-NAV sequence.
Update. I came across a post from @John Collins indicating that the new holding function is not currently supported by FlightStream and that even if it did, the receiving GPS would need to support holds.
Update. I came across a post from @John Collins indicating that the new holding function is not currently supported by FlightStream and that even if it did, the receiving GPS would need to support holds.