Generally yaw is controlled on a flying wing by creating drag on one of the wing tips. I'm not that familiar with the original Northrup flying wing -- but I imagine -- it had a way to create drag on a wing to provide yaw control. You could get some minimal yaw control with differential thrust.
On something like the B2 I imagine the computer handles all of this. Because it's more complicated than just adding some drag. Doing so causes other effects.
Their effectiveness for yaw control diminishes considerably if the yaw angle gets very high and I did manage to get the sim into an unrecoverable spin more than once while trying a 360 degree aileron roll (something my instructor said hadn't/couldn't be done but I made it work eventually). I found that if you stayed anywhere near a 90 degree bank for very long (more than a couple seconds) the thing would fall sideways like a rock.
The history channel made it seem like computer on the B2 prevents such things including plain old stalls.
Does it tumble when it stalls?
So no stalls, but I was also told that since they never took the prototypes past about 60 degrees of bank or into any stalls, flight in that part of the envelope was based solely on computer analysis.
At a couple billion a pop it's little wonder why.
So no stalls, but I was also told that since they never took the prototypes past about 60 degrees of bank or into any stalls, flight in that part of the envelope was based solely on computer analysis.
I think that's based on bad experiences with previous wings (YB-49). Supposedly a test pilot (Robert L. Cardenas??) stalled at 20,000'. He couldn't recover normally so he throttled up the right side engines to enter an inverted spin which test pilots know how to recover.
I'm still trying to reliably cite that but my google fu fails me.