Doc Holliday
En-Route
Babbling on about the 'denominator' doesn't make it go away.
But over emphasizing the numbers don't help either.
Babbling on about the 'denominator' doesn't make it go away.
FYI: Not a realistic comparison. South Korean actually had a number of significant advantages. Due to history with their brethren to the north, the South's national strategic supply of all things survival was light years beyond most other countries. And it came a financial cost. However, with the current SARS it finally paid dividends. Fast for ward to 2009, the US had a similar stockpile but not on the scale of South Korea. Yet once our stockpile was 60%+ depleted due to the Swine Flu it was never replenished due to financial concerns and a "rolling inventory" mentality. Same as the G7 nations.
Methodology explained here:
https://blogs.sas.com/content/graphicallyspeaking/2019/03/18/how-deadly-was-the-flu-in-2019/
Note that I'm not a statistician or in the medical field, so I can't comment on the method used. Just curious. If we say the worst week since 2010 saw about 1600 deaths per week, that's 228/day. Pretty sure we are exceeding that.
Those are estimates out of the flu surveillance system, they do not represent 1:1 tested Influenza cases. This is an indirect measure they arrive at based on prevalence of the different strains vs. all reported deaths from 'flu and pneumonia'.
228/day. That's for the country, not one city.
Right. I understood it was for the entire country. I got 228 by dividing the worst week by 7. All other weeks were better than that.Those are estimates out of the flu surveillance system, they do not represent 1:1 tested Influenza cases. This is an indirect measure they arrive at based on prevalence of the different strains vs. all reported deaths from 'flu and pneumonia'.
228/day. That's for the country, not one city.
I think we agree that South Korea is an anomaly in the SARS fight. As to the comparison of a "stern letter" vs sending a cop, there's no agreement as we have a Bill of Rights and the South Koreans have a National Security Act which null and voids a number of their citizens normal rights. Apples and oranges.Here the health department sends you a sternly worded letter, they don't send a cop to check on you or track your cellphone and credit card usage.
All of the interventions in the US so far appear to have at most caused a decrease in the exponential growth rate of confirmed cases from a doubling time of 2.5 days to 4.3 days (of course, those may not have been the primary determining factors). If one assumes this will continue exponentially to 70% infection or immunity for herd immunity, this means the time to achieve that was moved from around April 24 to May 17.
Please note obvious limitations for the very simple model and assuming confirmed cases are a substantial fraction of the total. But this is a rough estimate of the likely maximum effect of those interventions based on current data.
I think we agree that South Korea is an anomaly in the SARS fight. As to the comparison of a "stern letter" vs sending a cop, there's no agreement as we have a Bill of Rights and the South Koreans have a National Security Act which null and voids a number of their citizens normal rights. Apples and oranges.
Hard to say.. heart disease and cancer aren't contagious though. Until we have a either a smarter approach to this, a vaccine, or some form of herd immunity I believe we need to take the best precautions we canwhere do you think the final body count from SARS will fall when compared to this
And lets not forget the tens of thousands of those traveling from China who rerouted their flights from the west coast through the EU to NY/NJ after the Jan 31 travel ban. It was a big factor in the Europe foreign national travel ban weeks later.Btw. On a /100k population basis, I anticipate that after all this is over, the US will come out reasonably well. NYC is a bit of an outlier as in:
- just how densely people are piled on top of each other
- the high use of public transit
- the heterogeneity of the population when it comes to education and understanding the english language
- attitudes
- oh and some factors I cant mention here without running into the buzzsaw of Management Council enforcement
Very interesting read, thanks. I thought this part was especially ominous:Here is a very interesting read. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.22.20041079
Part of its conclusion is “One-time social distancing efforts will push the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic peak into the autumn, potentially exacerbating the load on critical care resources if there is increased wintertime transmissibility.”
Kissler et al said:[...] longer and more stringent social distancing did not always correlate with greater reductions in epidemic peak size. In the case of a 20-week period of social distancing with 60% reduction in R0, for example, the resurgence peak size is nearly the same as the peak size of the uncontrolled epidemic: the social distancing is so effective that virtually no population immunity is built. The greatest reductions in peak size come from social distancing intensity and duration that divide cases approximately equally between peaks [...]
Yes. Extreme isolation (family groups or smaller) for three or four weeks plus a total ban on international travel would have largely done the trick. And we'd be back to biz as usual already.Unfortunately we tried the educating approach and life here went on as usual so they shut places down. The whole thing sucks
And the measures seem to work.. they've been super aggressive around here, even closed the harbor to boating and have been ticketing people for going outside without a good reason. 22 people were ticketed just the other night for watching the sunset by the beach..Yes. Extreme isolation (family groups or smaller) for three or four weeks plus a total ban on international travel would have largely done the trick. And we'd be back to biz as usual already.
Except that unless EVERYONE did it worldwide, or a strict ban on international travel was kept in place after isolation was lifted, the virus would come back sooner or later... probably sooner.Yes. Extreme isolation (family groups or smaller) for three or four weeks plus a total ban on international travel would have largely done the trick. And we'd be back to biz as usual already.
The measures work, but since this pandemic is global, they're not going to have a permanent effect until herd immunity is achieved.
Except that unless EVERYONE did it worldwide, or a strict ban on international travel was kept in place after isolation was lifted, the virus would come back sooner or later... probably sooner.
The measures work, but since this pandemic is global, they're not going to have a permanent effect until herd immunity is achieved.
After we all stop living the death rate will be 0. Brilliant.Just a thought on the total deaths not changing discussion. Considering the number of deaths in the Western world from automobile accidents, I might actually expect total deaths to go down during strict movement restrictions. COVID 19 may save lives.