Link?They just made another post today.
Well shucks. I guess you have to have an account to see much on that site. The FAA choosing that as a platform to disseminate information seems an odd way for a government agency to conduct business.
The federal government has been present on social media for more than a decade. FWIW, I don't think that Instagram post shared anything new.Well shucks. I guess you have to have an account to see much on that site. The FAA choosing that as a platform to disseminate information seems an odd way for a government agency to conduct business.
Yeah, I know. They are on facesnaptwitagram.The federal government has been present on social media for more than a decade. FWIW, I don't think that Instagram post shared anything new.
And they still haven't figured out how to use it. Cause this ain't it. This is right up there with the ATF's valentine's day tweet inviting psychos to rat out their exes to the feds.The federal government has been present on social media for more than a decade. FWIW, I don't think that Instagram post shared anything new.
It’s really intimidating to know that if you want to become part of the group of people that fly you have to be an almost perfect specimen in every way. There are some people that should not fly and that is a fact, however with all the hoops one must jump through, and all the money that is spent on testing and evaluations 98% of all applications are ultimately approved and medical issues account for almost no GA accidents. Just think of all the time,money, and stress that could be avoided if the AME (who is a doctor). Could make the call in the office. It’s like it has become some kind of tradition that getting your medical is a gauntlet that we all must run. What a process.
Whether or not you're taking anything for any mental health issue, you're still going to have to go through HIMS, jump through all those hoops, pay between $5K-$10K, and then wait 6+ months for them to get back to you. This is the biggest issue facing the IRS...I mean the FAA...
I jumped through the non-HIMS P&P hoops. Got my SI and Third Class. I have a history of a mental health condition and don't see why the FAA was wrong to be concerned. Personally, I don't want someone with an uncontrolled version of what I have flying around.
I jumped through the non-HIMS P&P hoops. Got my SI and Third Class. I have a history of a mental health condition and don't see why the FAA was wrong to be concerned. Personally, I don't want someone with an uncontrolled version of what I have flying around.
Personally, I don't want someone with an uncontrolled version of what I have flying around.
Pretty big reach to say, IT WAS THE ADHD, when the "normal" was a "old senior check airman" (with more experience) that had the luxury of not having any tasks whatsoever. I've had the luxury of dealing with situations as the pilot that is handling a bunch of tasks, and I've had the luxury of dealing with situations as the observer who is handling nothing and just observing/thinking. Given the observer naturally has less to think about, they're going to perform better when it comes to observing & analyzing.Consider for example the response of the A380 crew wthen the #2 engine autodestructed over the Indian Ocean. The flying Captain and FO were totally occupied with the 390 ACARS messages.
Othe old senior Check airman in teh jumpseat merely asked:
(1) What is our airspeed
(2) What is our fuel state and loss rate?
(3) How many miles to the nearest servicable airport, and what is our rate of descent?
So the question becomes then, "How much anxiety would a normal have?.
Clearly the senior airman had it right. The crew, not so much.
Pretty big reach to say, IT WAS THE ADHD, when the "normal" was a "old senior check airman" (with more experience) that had the luxury of not having any tasks whatsoever. I've had the luxury of dealing with situations as the pilot that is handling a bunch of tasks, and I've had the luxury of dealing with situations as the observer who is handling nothing and just observing/thinking. Given the observer naturally has less to think about, they're going to perform better when it comes to observing & analyzing.
Unfortunately, about 30% of the "history of stimulants" folks got stimulants becuase of an undisclosed histoyr of depression and/or anxiety disorders. When that is active, cognition cannot possbly be right. This is geting in the very NOT GOOD territory. Commonly the attitude is "but I am fine now" (airman beats on chest) when the reality of the situaiton is that with the slightest stressors, the anxieety will return, just putting the kabosh on noraml cognition and multitasking. So each case is "indivisual consideration" and "highly expert" evaluation(s).
Consider for example the response of the A380 crew wthen the #2 engine autodestructed over the Indian Ocean. The flying Captain and FO were totally occupied with the 390 ACARS messages.
Othe old senior Check airman in teh jumpseat merely asked:
(1) What is our airspeed
(2) What is our fuel state and loss rate?
(3) How many miles to the nearest servicable airport, and what is our rate of descent?
So the question becomes then, "How much anxiety would a normal have?.
Clearly the senior airman had it right. The crew, not so much.