Craig
Cleared for Takeoff
You'd think they could get the correct model and country markings in the ad photo....
No pencil no sale!View attachment 120703Log into Facebook
Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.www.facebook.com
Yeah, the last thing I would want would be a transponder squawking in a combat zone.
Well, aircraft do squawk in combat zones because friendly tracking is a necessity. While that’s mostly modes 1,2,4 and 5, in both Iraq and Afghanistan we squawked mode 3 as well. EMCOM and transponder emissions aren’t that big of deal in 3rd world countries.you also don't want anyone tracking aircraft movement (specific aircraft - think special mission of any kind, and groups of aircraft).
of course stealth aircraft can turn off transponders, etc
actually, most of the USAF aircraft can turn stuff off
Because that's not what they're trained to do. They watch the pilot to make sure they got a good chute, identify where they went down and stay onsite long enough to try and direct SAR to the site.The news articles also discuss a second F-35, his wingman. I'm surprised his wingman didn't track the aircraft after he ejected.
You only saw it if they wanted to be seen. Most stealth aircraft have available radar reflectors to provide a return if desired.Military radar. I’ve seen it paint just fine.
Many fighters can turn off every emitter with one button push.of course stealth aircraft can turn off transponders, etc
actually, most of the USAF aircraft can turn stuff off.
K.Because that's not what they're trained to do. They watch the pilot to make sure they got a good chute, identify where they went down and stay onsite long enough to try and direct SAR to the site.
Well, it is designed to be difficult to see (visually and on radar). At the speed it was traveling, after one orbit around the wingman's chute, it was probably many miles away. And I'm guessing the pilot was expecting the plane to crash nearby and leave a big smoking hole. So why focus on that?K.
So the other ship, our state-of-the-art, 5th gen fighter- can't track the incident aircraft BVR while the pilot keeps eyes on the chute for a short period of time?
Now they're saying it could've been a zombie flight, on AP going for hundreds of miles? Under what circumstances would the pilot be justified punching out of a $80,000,000+ aircraft that was capable of controlled flight?
They (military) KNOW what happened here. Clearly the pilot that ejected communicated (whether wingman or lead) with the other the nature of the emergency before ejecting from the aircraft.
Or maybe- unintentional ejection?
Something stinks about this...JMO.
Do you have the logbooksView attachment 120703Log into Facebook
Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.www.facebook.com
*Serbia has entered the chat*EMCOM and transponder emissions aren’t that big of deal in 3rd world countries.
You know what was funny about the Balkans, is we got chaff and ELTs there. Made no sense at the time.*Serbia has entered the chat*
Ah, The Daily Mail, the epitome of factual reporting.Found!
Missing F-35 found: Debris from $80M jet recovered north of Charleston
A Marine Corps F-35 fighter jet which was missing since its pilot ejected over South Carolina has been found north of Charleston, the military said on Monday afternoon.www.dailymail.co.uk
Snake, spiders or wasps??OK...what would cause a pilot to eject yet the plane was apparently able to continue straight and level for a while on autopilot?...mistake the eject lever for the lumbar support adjustment?
Ah, The Daily Mail, the epitome of factual reporting.
I get the jest. But…. They seem to do better than US-based media/news.
True, was thinking higher threat.Well, aircraft do squawk in combat zones because friendly tracking is a necessity. While that’s mostly modes 1,2,4 and 5, in both Iraq and Afghanistan we squawked mode 3 as well. EMCOM and transponder emissions aren’t that big of deal in 3rd world countries.