Dog owners, would you buy the Poo Trap?

In a word, no. That dog must have been drugged to not be trying to chew that thing off.
 
I can't even get my KID to wear it!
 

Attachments

  • no diapers.jpg
    no diapers.jpg
    16 KB · Views: 29
Wow. What an innovative and creative solution to a common problem!

How did the inventor EVER think of it? And they say our education system is failing!

This guy absolutely the DESERVES the $billions he'll make.

:no:

We have entered idiocracy.
 
Wow. What an innovative and creative solution to a common problem!
I don't have a dog right now, but on occasion am known to dog-sit, and in my neighborhood, picking up poop is a legal and ethical requirement (one often overlooked), given that the combination of high population density with limited "green space" and "leaving it there" results in a poop-rich environment. In the summer-time, well, let's say it bakes, and the parks, well, they smell, and that's even with a lot of (but not all) people picking up.

But, really, I can't imagine trying to attach a poop bag to the dog's butt.
-harry
 
But, really, I can't imagine trying to attach a poop bag to the dog's butt.
-harry

Talk about asserting dominance.:D

I just want to know how this works out when it bakes in the summer? :no:
 
I'd be willing to give it a shot.

Piper probably wouldn't though.
 
Everybody poops, maybe the market is larger than the inventors initially anticipated:-harry

The former is for hikers who don't want to bury their digestive wastes. This is discouraged in a number of national parks as being environmentally unfriendly.

For the doggie thing, there must be some seriously lazy or stupid people out there. Curbing your dog is neither difficult or even disgusting. I use grocery-store plastic baggies turned inside out. No biggie. That said, just because it's on the internet doesn't mean anyone's buying it. I do have the sinking feeling that people will though. There are enough of them out there.
 
My dog, a recent acquisition to my home,(he was just dumped on the streets by his loving family) is an out of control, bad tempered, old jerk,(we get along just fine) he'd probably rip my hand off if I tried putting that thing on him. No, I don't believe that is something I would want to "mess" with. The plastic grocery bag works just fine.

John
 
Everyone is talking about how difficult this device would be to put on the dog.

The entertainment comes when trying to remove the device :D
 
This has brought humor to my evening. Thank you Bill.
 
I love how it comes in three colors, blue, red, black. The first two would certainly blend in with the coat color of most dogs, eh?!?!?!
 
Hmmm... carry a bag or pooper-scooper... or deal with that harness (on and off), and still have to deal with a bag of dog crap. A special bag, at that- you can't "recycle" ordinary grocery bags with this device, I assume.

Hmmm...

And another problem: Peg always pees first, then poops. Pretty much every time. so I'd first have to deal with a Poo-Bag overflowing with pee, then put another bag on there (quickly!)...or do I wait until she pees, then...?

Hmmm... lemme think....

Yeah, it's stupid.:thumbsup:
I'll take the grocery bag (or newspaper, or whatever's handy).

But I agree that this will be a huge seller. :dunno:
 
The former is for hikers who don't want to bury their digestive wastes. This is discouraged in a number of national parks as being environmentally unfriendly.

.

As a total side note I never really got that. I mean if an animal ie bear, deer, moose what ever relieve itself in the woods thats ok for the enviornment but not so for a human. But a human is an animal and I'd pretty much bet that before westerners came to this continent the native americans and other indigenous people shat in the woods.
 
As a total side note I never really got that. I mean if an animal ie bear, deer, moose what ever relieve itself in the woods thats ok for the enviornment but not so for a human. But a human is an animal and I'd pretty much bet that before westerners came to this continent the native americans and other indigenous people shat in the woods.
There are a few concerns. One is that humans out in the woods for recreation tend to "cluster", e.g. follow the same trails, camp in the same campgrounds, so their activities are more concentrated in a smaller area than you might find with animals.

Also, for whatever peculiar reason, humans react more negatively to the sight of human waste than that of animal waste.

So out in the woods, hikers bury their poo.

But the problem is that there are some areas where burial isn't an option, e.g. on rocky terrain. In these areas, it's "pack it out".
-harry
 
There are a few concerns. One is that humans out in the woods for recreation tend to "cluster", e.g. follow the same trails, camp in the same campgrounds, so their activities are more concentrated in a smaller area than you might find with animals.

Also, for whatever peculiar reason, humans react more negatively to the sight of human waste than that of animal waste.

So out in the woods, hikers bury their poo.

But the problem is that there are some areas where burial isn't an option, e.g. on rocky terrain. In these areas, it's "pack it out".
-harry


This is entirely accurate. As an avid backpacker and primitive camper this is the norm. However, even in the "fourteeners" of Colorado I have NEVER had to pack out human waste. The people that publish and many whom read "Backpacker" and "Outdoors" magazines are extreme in this regard, but I also carry a firearm when I go in the woods and I imagine even the thought of a firearm to this crowd would cause them to soil themselves. :D
 
Ted just bought a case for his plane:fingerwag:

Normally we just use a grocery bag and jettison it from 5000 AGL. Ask me how I know. ;)

Oh, and that would never work.
 
my dog would laugh himself silly.
 
Good grief, what'll they think of next? ;)

Oh, to answer the OP question...not a snowballs chance.
 
"And your pet will love it too!!!" Ha, did they ask a test group of dogs what they thought?
 
Back
Top