Thanks. My worst nightmare is it disintegrating mid flight, and I'm very grateful that didn't happen. But yeah.
Disastrous First (and Last) Annual - Advice Needed
- Thread starter obw
- Start date
Thanks. My worst nightmare is it disintegrating mid flight, and I'm very grateful that didn't happen. But yeah.
Morgan3820
Ejection Handle Pulled
RV-9, 160 kts on 8 gph of mogas. New, pristine airframe. Do your own condition inspections. By the time you are signed off on the 25 mile restriction you will have forgotten all about this
Last edited:
He saw corrosion at the tail by shining his flashlight down the back on the inside, and became suspicious. He then removed the vertical stabilizer and saw significant corrosion in both the fin and the fuselage at the back of the plane. Now he was very concerned since he saw some mild corrosion in the baggage area but thought something bigger might have been covered it. He then removed the headliner and called me with the bad news....
Gary
En-Route
OUCH!! Those pictures are sad to view!!
Not sure I could offer any useful advice. A second opinion couldn't hurt, BUT, from what Im seeing, this could be ugly. Not sure I'd be ready to bring in the legal beagles - yet. I cannot fathom how the previous mechanics missed all this during annual/pre-buys. Whoever put their names on the last inspection stating that the aircraft was airworthy really was missing the boat, incompetent or just didn't look. How any decent mechanic could miss the fact that wing spar nuts/bolts were missing borders on criminal. Get everything documented, maybe a trip to the FAA isn't a bad start.
Not sure I could offer any useful advice. A second opinion couldn't hurt, BUT, from what Im seeing, this could be ugly. Not sure I'd be ready to bring in the legal beagles - yet. I cannot fathom how the previous mechanics missed all this during annual/pre-buys. Whoever put their names on the last inspection stating that the aircraft was airworthy really was missing the boat, incompetent or just didn't look. How any decent mechanic could miss the fact that wing spar nuts/bolts were missing borders on criminal. Get everything documented, maybe a trip to the FAA isn't a bad start.
Mtns2Skies
Final Approach
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2008
- Messages
- 5,631
- Display Name
Display name:
Mtns2Skies
Was the Cherokee shot down over the pacific in 1944 and only recently recovered? I think I've seen WWII planes recovered with less corrosion than that.
He spotted the tail corrosion during the inspection and asked me if it was OK if he checked it out further because he was concerned. I agreed.
wsuffa
Touchdown! Greaser!
Now we know why the last owner sold it.
Who did the engine overhaul? Given the condition of the airframe, I'd be wondering whether the engine is also a POS.
Who did the engine overhaul? Given the condition of the airframe, I'd be wondering whether the engine is also a POS.
Grum.Man
En-Route
Agreed. There probably isn’t a route where you will ever see a financial payback through litigation. I absolutely would not let this lack of professionalism go un checked. If not for your self, do it for the other people who may trust the previous mechanics.
OBW - where are you located?
But definitely get a second opinion, for no other reason than to document all the identified problems as well as any others that may be found. Then, and only then, do you take the next step, whether it's a report to the local FSDO or call a really good aviation attorney or call a salvage shop. Or combination.
But definitely get a second opinion, for no other reason than to document all the identified problems as well as any others that may be found. Then, and only then, do you take the next step, whether it's a report to the local FSDO or call a really good aviation attorney or call a salvage shop. Or combination.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2008
- Messages
- 7,837
- Location
- Marietta, GA
- Display Name
Display name:
Drake the Outlaw
The mechanics, of course, will say the nuts/bolts were in place. No way to prove otherwise. But the corrosion? No way that happens over the short term. Even if the FAA can't do anything to them, I suspect all of them will get a good reminder about their professional responsibilities.
Plane is in Taunton MA (KTAN). I already have calls into salvage yards...
wsuffa
Touchdown! Greaser!
If you're going to complain to the FAA about prior mechanics, the FSDO may well want to look at the plane themselves....
Grum.Man
En-Route
They will have a non affiliated mechanic review the airplane and make a squawk list. Been down this road before, not as severe as the OP extent thankfully. Given the multiple people this oversight passed through I wouldn’t expect serious action. They will get a stern talking to, maybe probation, at worst they will have their license suspended until they re-take the written test.
steingar
Taxi to Parking
I'd go that route. The only thing left is revenge.
Silvaire
En-Route
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2012
- Messages
- 4,679
- Display Name
Display name:
Silvaire
Um, let's be clear here. This is absolutely not something one normally comes across in an annual inspection. In fact it's probably something that should be reported as you'd definitely want to find out how a couple of wing spar nuts went missing. It may be an error or it may be a material defect of some sort that could affect others.
Dan Thomas
Touchdown! Greaser!
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2008
- Messages
- 11,363
- Display Name
Display name:
Dan Thomas
Yup. That level of corrosion didn't just happen in the last two or three years. Which highlights the big factor in all of this: Annual inspections that are little more than an oil change and a preflight check. There is no way that this sort of thing would get past an inspection that complied with FAR43 Appendix D. Some excerpts:
(a) Each person performing an annual or 100-hour inspection shall, before that inspection, remove or open all necessary inspection plates, access doors, fairing, and cowling.
(f) Each person performing an annual or 100-hour inspection shall inspect (where applicable) all components of the wing and center section assembly for poor general condition, fabric or skin deterioration, distortion, evidence of failure, and insecurity of attachment.
(g) Each person performing an annual or 100-hour inspection shall inspect (where applicable) all components and systems that make up the complete empennage assembly for poor general condition, fabric or skin deterioration, distortion, evidence of failure, insecure attachment, improper component installation, and improper component operation.
You can see that the corroded fin and stab attachment and missing spar bolt nuts should have been caught years ago. $200 annuals don't buy you proper inspections. All you're paying for is a signature, not safety.
Last edited:
NordicDave
En-Route
@obw What a gut punch. Don't rule out a low consumption legal route.
@Dan Thomas comments above are good insights.
A strongly worded legal letter outlining a case for the Pre-buy mechanic, and last 2 IA's which inspected the aircraft might need to pony up. Part of the letter should be threatening action with the FAA. People lose their credentials over stuff like this. The IA's or the shop they work for may even carry insurance. Some do and some don't. Sounds like malpractice or even fraud from several parties.
Easy to make an accusation of fraud and negligence from the previous A&P who painted the plane, and the A&P/IA inspecting the carry through spar.
With low time, bet the plane was a ramp rat the A&P pulled out of the weather and painted over.
Even if you decide to just move-on, Some of these characters need to come to the attention of the FAA.
@Dan Thomas comments above are good insights.
A strongly worded legal letter outlining a case for the Pre-buy mechanic, and last 2 IA's which inspected the aircraft might need to pony up. Part of the letter should be threatening action with the FAA. People lose their credentials over stuff like this. The IA's or the shop they work for may even carry insurance. Some do and some don't. Sounds like malpractice or even fraud from several parties.
Easy to make an accusation of fraud and negligence from the previous A&P who painted the plane, and the A&P/IA inspecting the carry through spar.
With low time, bet the plane was a ramp rat the A&P pulled out of the weather and painted over.
Even if you decide to just move-on, Some of these characters need to come to the attention of the FAA.
Last edited:
Dan Thomas
Touchdown! Greaser!
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2008
- Messages
- 11,363
- Display Name
Display name:
Dan Thomas
Not normally, no. But I did ferry a 172 once, and subsequently found the lower strut attachment bolts were missing their nuts. There was a long list of almost-equally shocking findings on that airplane, including a stabilizer forward spar that was broken completely through.
bnt83
Final Approach
Are the wings good? Is the fuselage repairable?
If so, there are a crap ton of vertical stabilizers on this planet, should be able to find one that decent.
Or at that point maybe you can get some decent $$$ for what still good.
If so, there are a crap ton of vertical stabilizers on this planet, should be able to find one that decent.
Or at that point maybe you can get some decent $$$ for what still good.
hindsight2020
Final Approach
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Messages
- 6,998
- Display Name
Display name:
hindsight2020
And people have the temerity of casting shade on the E-AB mx rules and allowances as "the" slippery slope in this sector. Un-f---real, this fac-built moral hazard swamp. This is why my delta_capex on fac-built is staying at $0 until I fully exit to EAB. Patronizing this stuff is defending the indefensible anymore, but I'm still railing from the latest moral hazard AD on my lap, so I digress. To each their own.
I'd def put the prior mechanics and that POS airline time builder who sold it to ya, right on blast. That plausible deniability shtick may work for the courts, but we all recognize that kind of damage doesn't happen overnight. Pushing it forward on someone is criminal in my moral code. Allegedly/presumably flying with the 2 missing bolts per wing from the eddy current inspection? JHC. That has to be investigated, even if to put it on the record wrt the inspecting party. That could have led to an overstress condition on the spars, and get you killed. At best, initiating the crack the inspection was meant to guard against in the first place. All around this whole arc of a situation is a football bat of moral hazards.
I'd be 100% be the squeaky wheel with the FSDO over this, just for the catharsis and stress-inducing value onto the aggrieving parties. It would be 100% worth the effort if I was in said position.
--break break--
As to the salvage and parting-out angle, I'm actually quite interested in the answer to that, as it is unlikely I'll ever overhaul the engine on my current plane. I've never dealt with the salvage side of the house, though frankly I've tired of the buy/sell kabuki. Salvaging it, parting out, or going the static display route like @Ted did with the Aztec would be an easy way of recouping a few nickels after I'm done getting the utility value out of the purchase.
Like @Morgan3820 suggested, I've too also been toying with the idea of ripping the 430w+indicator out of it on my way out, and putting it in whatever RV I get to replace it. Thought about the engine, but I'm told an angle valve 360 plus heavy hartzell CS prop combo is too much engine for the nose of an 6A (which I'm inclinded to agree). But that's on a timed out engine, I'd figure on a freshly overhauled unit like you're sitting on, the resale value would be much better.
Keep us posted.
I'd def put the prior mechanics and that POS airline time builder who sold it to ya, right on blast. That plausible deniability shtick may work for the courts, but we all recognize that kind of damage doesn't happen overnight. Pushing it forward on someone is criminal in my moral code. Allegedly/presumably flying with the 2 missing bolts per wing from the eddy current inspection? JHC. That has to be investigated, even if to put it on the record wrt the inspecting party. That could have led to an overstress condition on the spars, and get you killed. At best, initiating the crack the inspection was meant to guard against in the first place. All around this whole arc of a situation is a football bat of moral hazards.
I'd be 100% be the squeaky wheel with the FSDO over this, just for the catharsis and stress-inducing value onto the aggrieving parties. It would be 100% worth the effort if I was in said position.
--break break--
As to the salvage and parting-out angle, I'm actually quite interested in the answer to that, as it is unlikely I'll ever overhaul the engine on my current plane. I've never dealt with the salvage side of the house, though frankly I've tired of the buy/sell kabuki. Salvaging it, parting out, or going the static display route like @Ted did with the Aztec would be an easy way of recouping a few nickels after I'm done getting the utility value out of the purchase.
Like @Morgan3820 suggested, I've too also been toying with the idea of ripping the 430w+indicator out of it on my way out, and putting it in whatever RV I get to replace it. Thought about the engine, but I'm told an angle valve 360 plus heavy hartzell CS prop combo is too much engine for the nose of an 6A (which I'm inclinded to agree). But that's on a timed out engine, I'd figure on a freshly overhauled unit like you're sitting on, the resale value would be much better.
Keep us posted.
Ted
The pilot formerly known as Twin Engine Ted
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2007
- Messages
- 30,006
- Display Name
Display name:
iFlyNothing
To clarify, "static display" isn't exactly what I did. I sold it to an A&P school and to my knowledge they are still using it to train the next generation of A&Ps. That is an option, and you can donate it as well to such places. The A&P school where I learned to fly had a number of donated airplanes, including a 727 from FedEx.
TrueCourse
Line Up and Wait
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2019
- Messages
- 944
- Display Name
Display name:
TrueCourse
Wow, a disgusting shame to all those who knew about it or missed it. Especially the missing spar bolt nuts. I wouldn't look at this whole situation with a soft glove and just give a pass on it. People are paid to inspect, to know, to fix, and to help those trusting these airplanes to not kill us. Just think if you had hit some serious turbulence that the airplane couldn't handle but should have. The accident report would have discovered all of this and it would have been a monumental event.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2017
- Messages
- 3,912
- Location
- hopefully not at work
- Display Name
Display name:
Meet the Fokkers
Considering no one here on PoA has personally seen your aircraft yet you're ready to sell it as salvage then no use offering other options. Regardless, for what it's worth, based on the very limited info/pics you've provided I did not see anything earth shattering that would require scrapping the aircraft. But to each their own. Good luck.
I'm definitely interested in hearing options. One of them is scrapping the plane, hence the call to the salvage shops to see what it might be worth, but I haven't made any decisions. The feedback from the forum has been very helpful, and I'm all ears.
Dan Thomas
Touchdown! Greaser!
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2008
- Messages
- 11,363
- Display Name
Display name:
Dan Thomas
If the previous owner was in the habit of cheaping out on annuals, who's to say that the engine overhaul wasn't also a shade-tree affair? That engine might have the original 1962 cylinders on it, just honed a bit for the new rings but with the original corrosion pits still visible and maybe worn beyond service limits. Those old cylinders also had a habit of cracking their heads between the sparkplug holes and valve seats. Are the magnetos just cleaned-up 1962 mags? How about the carb and fuel pump?
I'd be checking a bunch on that engine, including the parts list on the overhaul work order and the list of ADs addressed at the time. If there's no such paperwork I'd get really suspicious.
I'd be checking a bunch on that engine, including the parts list on the overhaul work order and the list of ADs addressed at the time. If there's no such paperwork I'd get really suspicious.
Yikes, that's the kind of rust I expect to see on a 30 year old pickup truck not a supposedly airworthy aircraft. Never seen one that bad that wasn't already wreckage. Sorry that happened to you, man. At least nobody had to find out in the air.
Unkljohn
Pre-takeoff checklist
That sucks! Sorry you have to deal w that. Good luck.
I would say that were extremely Un-Lucky... and LUCKY to have found these issues. Sure it sucks from a $ perspective, but better the issues were found on the ground. I hope this cautionary tale sparks some headliner removals and the usage of tons of flashlight batteries... good work on sharing your story, you may have saved a life or two.
A few months back there was a 61 Cherokee for sale in Michigan. Not sure if it was a 150 or 160. Engine had almost zero time. Owner had it overhauled...then the next year lost his medical. Plane sat in the barn ever since. The ask wasn't much. Put your engine, prop, radios, and interior in the other plane. In the end its probably all the same. I feel for you! Based on log entries, can you tell where this plane was based for its life?
Perhaps others can weigh in. I was actually trying to use the google machine the other day to verify this. But wasnt all the Comanche interior aluminum primed and Piper failed to do the same on the Cherokee and why the Cherokee has some corrosion issues?
Perhaps others can weigh in. I was actually trying to use the google machine the other day to verify this. But wasnt all the Comanche interior aluminum primed and Piper failed to do the same on the Cherokee and why the Cherokee has some corrosion issues?
EdFred
Taxi to Parking
A few options here:
Bend over, and sell it for what you can scrap value. My least favorite option.
Give the previous IA's a chance to make it right, and if they have to drag the previous owner into this, then so be it.
Legal route for gross negligence and misrepresentation
r/nuclearrevenge
No matter what the above choice you go with, in regards to the IA's that signed off on this:
Everyone chant with me "Dox them! Dox them! Dox them! Dox them!"
Bend over, and sell it for what you can scrap value. My least favorite option.
Give the previous IA's a chance to make it right, and if they have to drag the previous owner into this, then so be it.
Legal route for gross negligence and misrepresentation
r/nuclearrevenge
No matter what the above choice you go with, in regards to the IA's that signed off on this:
Everyone chant with me "Dox them! Dox them! Dox them! Dox them!"
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2008
- Messages
- 7,837
- Location
- Marietta, GA
- Display Name
Display name:
Drake the Outlaw
Yes. But I wouldn't characterize it as "Failed". Chose is the more appropriate word. Nobody thought "starter" airplanes would still be in common use 60 years after they were built.