I’m thinking about writing a proactive letter to the Hoa for the community that was just built next to our airport recently and complain that they aren’t flying enough. I never see them buzz over my house in their planes. It’s a travesty.
Page 20, Part 1 of the AIM (1969), for one.I've heard that, but have never been able to find a reference for it. Do you know of one?
That's a start. Thanks!Page 20, Part 1 of the AIM (1969), for one.
Or maybe I should complain about their houses in the way of my crash site? Too many cars parked in the street blocking my crash landing? Light pollution making it harder to see the airport at night?I’m thinking about writing a proactive letter to the Hoa for the community that was just built next to our airport recently and complain that they aren’t flying enough. I never see them buzz over my house in their planes. It’s a travesty.
Ah, the memo I missed. See par 4.: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/70562That's a start. Thanks!
I was 4 years old then yet it's still in the regulation today. Have you seen it any more recent sources?
Hey, that's great! Thanks! You're better at looking stuff up than I am.Ah, the memo I missed. See par 4.: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/70562
Be durned! Sure enough, it's still mentioned in my 1976 AIM, though I have no recollection of it.Page 20, Part 1 of the AIM (1969), for one.
"Hello, until further notice, please conduct all takeoffs at idle power until pattern altitude."
I got the following e-mail from my home drone manager:
Good morning all,As the area resident population continues to grow, so do varying appreciations for aircraft noise. As stewards of aviation, practice and repetition of flying skills is paramount to safety and enjoyment. However, the noise that comes along with such practice is not always the most welcomed side effect by some of our neighbors. As a courtesy to the local resident perhaps some different practices could be implemented, while keeping safety, regulations and standards of the highest priority, such as alternating left-hand/right-hand traffic pattern, extending the legs of your traffic pattern and performing run-ups on the ramp or apron. Again, with keeping safety, regulations and standards foremost, should you decide to perform any of these alternate tactics, please do so only at your convenience and as conditions and operations allow. Please feel free to reach out with any questions or comments.Anyone else think his suggestions are dangerous, especially the alternating LH/RH traffic pattern?
And is it one person a hundred times or a hundred people once. The manager is never going to make that one person happy, but a hundred people can doom an airport in the long run.The manager has probably been getting some complaints, so try to learn some specifics. Who's complaining, and what's their location? Is there a specific time of day that's an issue?
We have a lady near our (private) airfield who lives under an area commonly used for PPL flight training. She is convinced the CIA and FBI are conducting aerial surveillance of her. Once every few months she visits to insist it stop.
most runways in public use are E or E to the ground. its unusual to find class G airports. yes they are out there but they are an uncommon exception and not a rule.I beg to differ. 91.126 indicates it is regulatory:
§ 91.126 Operating on or in the vicinity of an airport in Class G airspace.
(a) General. Unless otherwise authorized or required, each person operating an aircraft on or in the vicinity of an airport in a Class G airspace area must comply with the requirements of this section.
(b) Direction of turns. When approaching to land at an airport without an operating control tower in Class G airspace—
(1) Each pilot of an airplane must make all turns of that airplane to the left unless the airport displays approved light signals or visual markings indicating that turns should be made to the right, in which case the pilot must make all turns to the right; and
(2) Each pilot of a helicopter or a powered parachute must avoid the flow of fixed-wing aircraft.
Class G airports are common where I fly.most runways in public use are E or E to the ground. its unusual to find class G airports. yes they are out there but they are an uncommon exception and not a rule.
There are 3 within 10 nm of me.Class G airports are common where I fly.
most runways in public use are E or E to the ground. its unusual to find class G airports. yes they are out there but they are an uncommon exception and not a rule.
that said an entry in a A/FD is regulatory enough.
I agree. It’s not unusual at all to find class G airports, in fact, *most* non-primary airports are.@pfarber, you need to get out more, class G airports are far more numerous than class E surface airports. But you are correct about left turns being required, but that "unless otherwise required" is a loophole big enough to fly a 747 through.
Its rare for class E to go to the surface.most runways in public use are E or E to the ground. its unusual to find class G airports. yes they are out there but they are an uncommon exception and not a rule.
that said an entry in a A/FD is regulatory enough.
There are right about 40 charted nontowered airports within a 50 mile radius of me. A single one is Class E surface, and that is just “sort of” because it’s on the border of the Class E surface extension for the approach to a nearby airport.most runways in public use are E or E to the ground. its unusual to find class G airports. yes they are out there but they are an uncommon exception and not a rule.
that said an entry in a A/FD is regulatory enough.
The provisions of 91.126 are incorporated into the regulation for each type of airspace in 91.126-91.131 in each subsequent regulation's first paragraph. So, 91.126 applies to airports with all types of airspace from G up to B unless the specific airspaces regulation supersedes a portion of it.most runways in public use are E or E to the ground. its unusual to find class G airports. yes they are out there but they are an uncommon exception and not a rule.
that said an entry in a A/FD is regulatory enough.
most runways in public use are E or E to the ground. its unusual to find class G airports. yes they are out there but they are an uncommon exception and not a rule.
that said an entry in a A/FD is regulatory enough.
There are, and depending on the size of the airport, the company carrying the insurance for the airport may require those certifications.What are the qualifications to be an airport manager, anyway? I doubt there are any official ones, but maybe there should be.
@RyanB , care to engage?
There are, and depending on the size of the airport, the company carrying the insurance for the airport may require those certifications.
I count 5 on the SFO Terminal Area Chart.There are 3 within 10 nm of me.
Seems pretty much anything goes at small privately owned airports. One airport I frequented, the manager was one of the local pilots based there, he was otherwise retired so took the part time manager job, basically just cutting the grass, collecting hangar rent, and keeping the ultralight pilots (including me!) from getting too crazy. Another one, I'm told it was an unpaid position but the manager lived rent free in a house on the airport property. Now I'm at the airport owned by Whelen, the manager used to be their corporate pilot but they fired him, now it's just one of their employees who presumably has other duties as well.I applied to be a manager of a small town airport once. One requirement was to be able to drive the tractor to cut the grass...