Custom Checklist

William Pete Hodges

Line Up and Wait
PoA Supporter
Joined
Mar 6, 2020
Messages
598
Location
Virginia
Display Name

Display name:
Petehdgs
We are all familiar with checklists but to the newer pilots are you familiar with the concept of flow? I once had an instructor Is who introduced me to the concept of flow across the airplane controls. He pointed out that the checklist was fine if you had time to do it, but if you need to get the airplane in operation and moving in a hurry your best bet was to generate a flow across the cockpit controls in an orderly fashion. After looking at this in more detail I found that the checklist we were using did not follow the flow very well at all. What if you had a checklist that matched everything in your flow so that you would have all your checklist items in the same order that you generally would accomplish them? That means your checklist and your flow of the controls would both match and you would do the same thing in the same order every time you fly your airplane. Over time you would become more efficient in operating your plane and in memorizing the checklist at the same time.

I wrote my first checklist when I was a new pilot and new aircraft owner with a new to me 1968 Piper Cherokee. I set out to make a checklist that was in the same order of my flow so that my flow and my checklist matched. As you can imagine this takes some time and forethought, but I think the results were well worth all of the efforts involved. As you become more experienced, and you become a better pilot sooner or later you're going to find that there are certain things that you do in a specific way. Sometimes you find something that is better if done differently than you used to do, and when you find these things, you need to incorporate them into your checklist. This means that as you grow as a pilot you may have to rewrite your checklist from time to time. I have just rewritten my checklist for my M20E and that's why I decided to write this post.

Have you ever heard of the GIFFTS Check? It stands for Gear Instruments Fuel Faps Trim and Situational awareness. I was taught this check the first time I was flying in a retractable gear aircraft. My problem was that situational awareness was the last thing on the list. To me it was more important to be situationally aware before you start each phase of the checklist. After I bought my Mooney, I racked my brain to figure out a good acronym that started with your situation and created a new checklist based on every situation you encountered. The acronym I use is SPAGFIT. It kind of reminds me of an old Jetsons episode where George Jetson trotted out a bad Cogswell cog as the problem of the machine Is he was working on. (I mean, in the space age are you actually going to use cogs and sprockets? Really? The satire is just too funny.)

SPAGFIT stands for Situation Power Airspeed Gear Fuel Instruments and Trim. The S always stands for Situation, but the others can have different meanings depending on what you're looking for at the time. The A can be Airspeed, Altitude ATIS or AOA and the F can be Flaps or Fuel. My checklist is now 14 separate lists divided into 13 different situations. Not all of flows follow the SPAGFIT format but most of them do.

My Mooney is an all mechanical airframe with a crank up entry step that I sometimes forget, so I tied it to the insertion of the ignition key. This action is really the beginning of engine start sequence as I usually don't have passengers with me. The M20E also has a ram air boost that bypasses the air filter during climb. This should be off or closed at all times on or near the ground, and only opened during climb in clean air. Another feature is a mechanically operated speed brake, along with hydraulically operated mechanical flaps, and cowl flaps for engine cooling. Some of these features are not OEM equipment and are not on any factory checklists. I took the classes for advanced LOP engine management and run LOP most of the time. That means I lean aggressively on the ground and in the air during cruise and descent. I have constant air flow and fuel flow curves on a graph to help me lean properly. I also use a TAS correction table to quickly determine true airspeed in cruise. These are both on one half-page front and back, and the checklists are also on one half-page front and back. I use these regularly from the beginning of the flight to the end.

I have individual checklists for each of these situations: Engine Startup, Pre-Taxi, Runup, Pre-Takeoff, Climb, Level-off at Altitude, Descend from Altitude, Pattern Level-Off, Pattern Final, After Landing, and Shutdown. The last item on the last situation is to remove the key and crank down the entry step. This is my third iteration of this checklist. It is not perfect, but it gets better with every rewrite. I think it does a good job of matching my flows to all the items needing attention in the cockpit. I wrote this in MS Word. I had some trouble with the formatting, but it works. If anyone reading this would like a copy of my source file send me a message and I'll send it to you. You can use it as a template for your own checklist if you choose to write one. I hope your checklist works as well for you as this one does for me.
 

Attachments

  • N1935Y SPAGFIT Checklists REV3.pdf
    84.9 KB · Views: 19
  • N1935Y TAS FueL & Air Curves.pdf
    388.4 KB · Views: 9
Last edited:
I have been customizing my checklists since I was a student pilot over 30 years ago. It's the first thing I do when being introduced to a new airplane. Looking quickly, I even have some old ones written in WordPerfect (last modified in 1998)! And yes, they follow a flow.
Have you ever heard of the GIFFTS Check?
No, and I don't want to. You will never, ever see a mnemonic anywhere near my checklists.
 
I have been customizing my checklists since I was a student pilot over 30 years ago. It's the first thing I do when being introduced to a new airplane. Looking quickly, I even have some old ones written in WordPerfect (last modified in 1998)! And yes, they follow a flow.

No, and I don't want to. You will never, ever see a mnemonic anywhere near my checklists.
Do you have a custom checklist that you can share with us? And maybe you could tell us a little about what makes that airplane unique and how your checklist addresses that?
Thanks in advance!
 
Do you have a custom checklist that you can share with us? And maybe you could tell us a little about what makes that airplane unique and how your checklist addresses that?
Thanks in advance!
I don’t share them. Through the years, my checklists have become more and more personalized and condensed. A friend of mine once tried to use one of mine and found it unusable. Couldn’t figure out what ”Switches” with nothing else meant. On the flip side, the variety of airplanes I’ve flown (around 30 types of singles) means that some parts of the checklist have deeper detail as a reminder that others who fly one or two wouldn’t bother with.

I’m not sure what you mean by “what makes that airplane unique and how your checklist addresses that?” Airplane makes and models, and even individual airplanes within a model, are different in a variety of ways. A carbureted airplane checklist mentions carb heat; a fuel-injected one, alternate air. A Comanche has a fuel system that can produce vapor lock if the boost pump is in too long, so it deserves a note. Several airplane models have dual batteries and there’s a checklist item to switch them. A DA40NG does a runup by itself, so the runup checklist and indications to watch for is different than in a avgas piston. The variety of avionics and autopilots and the way they operate mean differences in operating procedures. A G1000 with a GFC700 is a wee different that a GNS530 coupled to a non-slewing King HSI and 150 autopilot. I account for those differences in various ways. Might be a different line item, a note, a highlight, even a supplemental checklist to remind me how to use a piece of supplemental equipment.

The one universal is they all follow the same ergonomic-to-me format. They look like this

6.1ChecklistFormat.jpg
 
I have been customizing my checklists since I was a student pilot over 30 years ago. It's the first thing I do when being introduced to a new airplane. Looking quickly, I even have some old ones written in WordPerfect (last modified in 1998)! And yes, they follow a flow.

No, and I don't want to. You will never, ever see a mnemonic anywhere near my checklists.
Mnemonics
Never
Ever
Meet
Or
Nearly
Intersect
Checklists
 
Mnemonics Never Eliminate Man's Only Nemesis - Insufficient Cerebral Storage

I did make one up, though.

ATEFA.
Aren’t There Enough F’ing Acronyms?
If one uses a mnemonic, it should be appropriate to the situation…f’rinstnace, the mnemonic for an engine failure should be OH ****, for a fire, it should be OH ****, for a…never mind. ;)
 
I don’t share them. Through the years, my checklists have become more and more personalized and condensed. A friend of mine once tried to use one of mine and found it unusable. Couldn’t figure out what ”Switches” with nothing else meant. On the flip side, the variety of airplanes I’ve flown (around 30 types of singles) means that some parts of the checklist have deeper detail as a reminder that others who fly one or two wouldn’t bother with.

I’m not sure what you mean by “what makes that airplane unique and how your checklist addresses that?” Airplane makes and models, and even individual airplanes within a model, are different in a variety of ways. A carbureted airplane checklist mentions carb heat; a fuel-injected one, alternate air. A Comanche has a fuel system that can produce vapor lock if the boost pump is in too long, so it deserves a note. Several airplane models have dual batteries and there’s a checklist item to switch them. A DA40NG does a runup by itself, so the runup checklist and indications to watch for is different than in a avgas piston. The variety of avionics and autopilots and the way they operate mean differences in operating procedures. A G1000 with a GFC700 is a wee different that a GNS530 coupled to a non-slewing King HSI and 150 autopilot. I account for those differences in various ways. Might be a different line item, a note, a highlight, even a supplemental checklist to remind me how to use a piece of supplemental equipment.

The one universal is they all follow the same ergonomic-to-me format. They look like this

6.1ChecklistFormat.jpg
Your experience and input is exactly what I was looking for. I want to convey that customizing a checklist for the airplane you fly is a good idea. It makes you think about your procedures and efficiency as a pilot and it allows you to tailor your list to address quirks particular to an airplane that you fly. Thank you for sharing!
 
Your experience and input is exactly what I was looking for. I want to convey that customizing a checklist for the airplane you fly is a good idea. It makes you think about your procedures and efficiency as a pilot and it allows you to tailor your list to address quirks particular to an airplane that you fly. Thank you for sharing!
My all-time favorite checklist addition isn’t mine. When I was doing primary training I always encouraged my students to create their own (yes I reviewed them). One day after a lesson in significant crosswinds, my student pulled out his checklist to show me the new entry in his landing checklist.
ROLLOUT - FULL AILERON DEFLECTION

Even the FAA thinks customization is a good idea

 
I make my own checklist too. It started with the poh and added fixed flow and other items

I’ve seen lots of variations from the basic “start plane” to a prescriptive 20 minute plan to start a 172 (only half exaggeration). I watched one pilot on the air use his checklist and completely blew through an ILS as it was so complicated.
 
I’ve seen lots of variations from the basic “start plane” to a prescriptive 20 minute plan to start a 172 (only half exaggeration). I watched one pilot on the air use his checklist and completely blew through an ILS as it was so complicated.
The worst tend to be flight school and club checklists. They tend to be for the lowest common denominator so they have a lot of extras. Plus, they seem to have all this localized information like frequencies, as though the pilots will never leave the practice area.

“Why don’t pilots use checklists,” lamented a flying club chief pilot. “Because most of them suck,” I replied.
 
I customize mine in FF, works great. You can drop n drag the order of things and such as ypu tweak it.

I did have it set to read me my checklist for my old plane but need to do it for this one. It’s really nice having it spoken to ya, like having a crewmate. I adjusted how I phrased things so I had time to do it comfortably before it would read the next. Like a mag check, on paper I prob would write “check mags” but in FF it was something like. “Check each magnito for slight rpm drop and return switch to both” by lengthening it, it gave me time to perform the task. It flowed very nice.
 
Its funny to read people trying to adopt airline practices to GA.... its just not that that hard to fly GA.

People DON'T use checklists so they they try and fool themselves into 'being smart' with mnemonics.

The worst is GUMPS. People justify it because, well they don't really know. I have yet to need to check for 3 green in a 172 or make sure the prop is set.

If you want to split hairs, the ONLY checklist you can legally use is the one actually INSIDE the POH/Manual. If you make one up, or alter the POH, you are no longer using approved data. The FAA has recently come out and advised pilots AGAINST home made lists https://www.flyingmag.com/faa-issues-checklist-warning/
 
If you want to split hairs, the ONLY checklist you can legally use is the one actually INSIDE the POH/Manual. If you make one up, or alter the POH, you are no longer using approved data. The FAA has recently come out and advised pilots AGAINST home made lists https://www.flyingmag.com/faa-issues-checklist-warning/
Ironically that checklist for my plane ('73 PA28) is a fraction of the size of the "Checkmate" checklist for the same plane. If I were to just copy those, it would fit on a 3x5 card (excluding the emergency stuff, which might need a second card). The point many are making is the approved checklists have so much dumb stuff on them that they don't get used. The other challenge is that so much is changed with modern avionics, that there are key tasks not in the POH lists.
 
I once had an instructor Is who introduced me to the concept of flow across the airplane controls. He pointed out that the checklist was fine if you had time to do it, but if you need to get the airplane in operation and moving in a hurry your best bet was to generate a flow across the cockpit controls in an orderly fashion.
This gives me major heartburn.
Rushing in the airplane to the point of not having time to perform a pre takeoff checklist.
 
Flow does not have to match the checklist.

When using flow, you look over the things and check they are were they are supposed to be, then use to the checklist to see that you saw and noticed everything.

So flow may start at the lower left (where the master and mags may be), go across the lower part of the panel to the far right, then up and to the left across the upper portion.

I do use GUMPS as a final double check when rolling out on final. I am intelligent enough to understand that on a C-172 that not all things apply, but that it is still a good habit to build into ALL your flying.
 
Anytime I check someone out a a new airplane to them with lots of systems like the Mooney., I help them create a checklist for it. It is a great way to review an understand all the systems, speeds, and configurations they need to know for the airplane.

Brian
 
The worst is GUMPS. People justify it because, well they don't really know. I have yet to need to check for 3 green in a 172 or make sure the prop is set.
People justify GUMPS in a 172 as a "law of primacy" for the supposed future when you will supposedly fly a retract. Personally, I've always thought the "law of primacy" lesson from GUMPS in a 172 is that there are no consequences to forgetting the gear, so don't worry about it.
 
I've often wondered if there is any correlation between gear up landings and flying both fixed and retractable gear aircraft. Either switching back and forth, or many years of fixed before moving to retract.
 
That article doesn’t seem to support your statements.
Yeah, "watch out for generic commercial checklists" and "be careful when you write you own " doesn't quite equal "don't customize."

Neither does the FAA video I linked earlier which specifically says pilots should (not just may) customize checklists.
 
Last edited:
Its funny to read people trying to adopt airline practices to GA.... its just not that that hard to fly GA.

People DON'T use checklists so they they try and fool themselves into 'being smart' with mnemonics.

The worst is GUMPS. People justify it because, well they don't really know. I have yet to need to check for 3 green in a 172 or make sure the prop is set.

If you want to split hairs, the ONLY checklist you can legally use is the one actually INSIDE the POH/Manual. If you make one up, or alter the POH, you are no longer using approved data. The FAA has recently come out and advised pilots AGAINST home made lists https://www.flyingmag.com/faa-issues-checklist-warning/
That article did not say that. Only to be cautious using commercial ones.
 
I've often wondered if there is any correlation between gear up landings and flying both fixed and retractable gear aircraft. Either switching back and forth, or many years of fixed before moving to retract.
That's an interesting question. You might get some numbers, but there are probably factors other than those two at work.

I gave a flight review in a Mooney the other day. As we descended to the pattern, the pilot pulled the throttle back far enough to generate the gear up warning tone. He made a point of noting it and saying the reason it happened (good), but didn't do anything to stop it. During the debrief, I suggested that letting an alarm continue without correcting it can result in ultimately ignoring it in exactly the wrong situation; planning descent power reductions earlier to avoid the need to reduce power to gear warning level would be a better technique.
 
That article did not say that. Only to be cautious using commercial ones.
BTW this is the FAA SAFO the article refers to. It's bottom line (COTS- Commercial Off The Shelf):

Pilots and operators, other than those operating an aircraft under 14 CFR Part 121 or 135 that choose to use COTS or personally developed checklists should meticulously compare them to the manufacturer’s checklist and placards contained in the POH/AFM to confirm they are consistent. This action will ensure the pilot has all pertinent manufacturer’s information during aircraft flight operations.​

It is not even a mild recommendation to avoid updating your 1959 Cessna checklist with newer best practices or tasks made necessary by your recent G5/GTNxi/GFC500 upgrade.
 
Last edited:
Its funny to read people trying to adopt airline practices to GA.... its just not that that hard to fly GA.

People DON'T use checklists so they they try and fool themselves into 'being smart' with mnemonics.

The worst is GUMPS. People justify it because, well they don't really know. I have yet to need to check for 3 green in a 172 or make sure the prop is set.

If you want to split hairs, the ONLY checklist you can legally use is the one actually INSIDE the POH/Manual. If you make one up, or alter the POH, you are no longer using approved data. The FAA has recently come out and advised pilots AGAINST home made lists https://www.flyingmag.com/faa-issues-checklist-warning/

Another slow day driving the lav truck?

Just like so many of your other proclamations, this too has no basis in reality.

And you once again proved your comprehension skills are lacking.

Please provide for us the regulation that states only the factory checklist in the POH is the only one allowed.
 
When I used to rent an Arrow as a very low time pilot, I would shout B-GUMPS B-GUMPS B-GUMPS at myself all the way through touchdown. :rofl:

Landing checklist in my Decathlon is MPB. All 3 controls are grouped together at left hand. Pretty sure I can remember that without a sheet of paper.
 
Last edited:
way back when I was very active and proficient..and was extremely familiar with one or tow particular rental aircraft, I made up some personalized checklists. Probably spent way more time that the average pilot thinking them through, writing and rewriting. They followed a flow but also cut out all the extraneous garbage that is in most generic lists.
In huge part it was tailored around my personal thoughts and habits. To a point of course, not so much need in checking something that I am extremely familiar with or that I'm so anal-retentive about that I might do it repeatedly or otherwise check or do without fail....so yes, it can be a very personal thing and not work for the "other guy"
So much so that a while back when I rented an aircraft, same model and variant of one that I have the most time in (172N), I found that after all those years of rust my custom checklist was very lacking for me. So many of my old thoughts and habits were broken and the list just didn't work well....
 
Those who fly Diamond DA40 will understand: the G1000 package isn’t part of the original Type Certificate. The main body of the POH is based on the analog version. Everything else - G1000, autopilot, for many in the US market, the prop too, are the subject of AFM Supplements. The differences are many. For example, what the fuel gauges show is different. There is a limitation on the original prop which disappears with the prop actually in the airplane.

If you don’t create your own checklist which accounts for the mods, chances are you are either (a) running back and forth among multiple checklists or (b) doing it wrong. (Yeah, I guess (c) is, “who needs a damn checklist?”)
 
Always built my own checklist that matched my flow...always hated the pre printed ones as it was too easy to gloss of the stupid/irrelevant things and miss relevant things in the process...built in PowerPoint and kept a multi page PDF on the iPad and could just swipe through the pages for each phase of flight. My CFII was impressed that I had even built one for approaches when learning.
 
The worst tend to be flight school and club checklists. They tend to be for the lowest common denominator so they have a lot of extras. Plus, they seem to have all this localized information like frequencies, as though the pilots will never leave the practice area.

“Why don’t pilots use checklists,” lamented a flying club chief pilot. “Because most of them suck,” I replied.
They do suck, but pilots don’t use them because they aren’t properly trained to how use them in single pilot operations the first day of training,
 
Last edited:
They do suck, but pilots don’t use them because they aren’t properly trained to how use them in single pilot operations starting day one of training.
I can't disagree with that.

Years ago I was doing a 172 → 182 transition. Like many, when he got his primary training in the 172, his pre-landing check was simple - the fuel is still on both, the mixture was set appropriately and the carb heat was hot. Flaps had been done incrementally in the pattern, so that wasn't an issue. No need for a written checklist for something that simple, right?

The addition of the prop in the 182 was no big deal but the trainee invariably forgot the cowl flaps. Every. Single. Time. After several reminders, I gave up and Instead of reminding him, I started just saying, "something is missing." He would look all around the cockpit trying to figure it out. Everywhere, that is, except the checklist sitting on the glareshield in his line of sight. His primary training taught him to ignore the checklist and it was out of mind even when it was in sight.
 
Back
Top