while all control surfaces are checked in preflight, i had no idea the entire stabilator is held by 2 bolts
Had that exact issue with my archer, replaced both bushings in my annual. Not cheap!
The stabilator bearings (2) were $83.40 each. I couldn't begin to guess what the labor came to as they lumped it into a bunch of stuff they had to do with the elevator trim. But I am guessing a couple of grand because the entire stabilator had to come off. It definitely was not just two bolts.May I ask roughly how much total for parts and labor?
Sounds expensive!! Way cheaper than not replacing in time I guess
Well, they said that they would let them slide until next annual but they were into the tail anyway so it was a "might as well" thing. This was the first annual for this plane since I bought it so I told the A&P's to go through it from one end to the other and fix anything questionable. It took over a month but now I am sure it's 100%, well worth the money for peace of mind.Sounds expensive!! Way cheaper than not replacing in time I guess
LOLOLOLOLWell, they said that they would let them slide until next annual but they were into the tail anyway so it was a "might as well" thing. This was the first annual for this plane since I bought it so I told the A&P's to go through it from one end to the other and fix anything questionable. It took over a month but now I am sure it's 100%, well worth the money for peace of mind.
Well 5 guys working on her for over a month to the tune of 12 grand got her pretty close to 100%. Like I said, nothing major, just a lot of little things but they went through it from prop to trim tab so confidence is high.LOLOLOLOL
100% ?!?!?!
This your first aircraft, I'm assume?
No matter how much work I do on my sweet baby, she always finds something else for me to replace...
...i had no idea the entire stabilator is held by 2 bolts
So they missed the spinner?they went through it from prop to trim tab
So they missed the spinner?
the entire stabilator had to come off. It definitely was not just two bolts.
That is not that expensive in grand scheme of things. b/w is this anyway related to AD 2013-2-13?It took me and another A&P 4.5 hours nonstop. Then it took another hour just to clean up shop and get back organized with all the paperwork.
FYI: if you're using the "100%" to indicate aircraft airworthiness keep in mind airworthiness is not a finite condition mainly due to it is highly subjective to the person determining that airworthiness. At best your $12k bought you what the 5 mechanics determined to be airworthy items or not, unless you were also an integral part of that determination. So if you put your "100%" aircraft up for sale today and the buyer's A&P finds "25%" of the aircraft unairworthy it doesn't always mean the previous 5 A&Ps "missed" something. However, regardless who determines the airworthiness of the aircraft, you as owner are the one held responsible for the condition of the aircraft.It took over a month but now I am sure it's 100%, well worth the money for peace of mind.
That is not that expensive in grand scheme of things. b/w is this anyway related to AD 2013-2-13?
I was heavily involved and I directed them to correct any discrepancies they found. If we only corrected enough to make it airworthy, I could have got off for a couple of grand but we opted to replace anything that was even questionable. I am very confident that everything is back to factory standards. Could we have missed something? Sure but we went through it very thoroughly and I have no trepidation putting my family and friends in that bird.FYI: if you're using the "100%" to indicate aircraft airworthiness keep in mind airworthiness is not a finite condition mainly due to it is highly subjective to the person determining that airworthiness. At best your $12k bought you what the 5 mechanics determined to be airworthy items or not, unless you were also an integral part of that determination. So if you put your "100%" aircraft up for sale today and the buyer's A&P finds "25%" of the aircraft unairworthy it doesn't always mean the previous 5 A&Ps "missed" something. However, regardless who determines the airworthiness of the aircraft, you as owner are the one held responsible for the condition of the aircraft.
Check my avatar, they are twins!@Joe_B1 b/w i got a '79 181 too. post a pic of your bird
As long as you understand by this comment that this is a classic example of the subjectivity of airworthy. Technically, there should be no difference between airworthy and "factory standards." Good luck.If we only corrected enough to make it airworthy, I could have got off for a couple of grand but we opted to replace anything that was even questionable.
...Another was verification and replacement of flexible flammable hoses forward of the firewall. Mechanics had been signing those old brittle hoses off for years. Some of the dates went back to the early 90’s. The oil cooler hoses were not in compliance with the AD that had been signed off. Check your dates. Mechanics can point to all sorts of documents to justify replacing or not replacing. Most information suggests 5, 7, or 10 years. None stay on my personal plane beyond 10 years, less depending on conditions.
Yep, I found original flexible brake hoses from piper 1979. These were the long ones that go from the calipers up to the wing spar. Rock hard brittle and leaking. I yanked ALL old hoses at one time. I measured, tagged, bagged, and sent all to the hose shop for duplication.
ha ha ha. its a odd winter here. we have some snow on the ground here and in MN, i was in SD last sunday... no snow anywhere to be found on the ground...This looks photoshopped! There's a distinct lack of snow blowing horizontally across the landscape in the direction of Minnesota.
It appears you are just a shadow of the man you are.