Huckster79
Pattern Altitude
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2018
- Messages
- 2,395
- Display Name
Display name:
Huckster79
I've had both a 120 and a 140. The 120 was the airplane I taught myself to fly a tailwheel airplane. It had the gear extenders, since it was a very early '46.
My 1946 140 has been crashed and rebuilt at least three times and just about every part has been replace except the fuselage and the right wing. It has the later style landing gear legs that move the axles forward three inches.
When I flew the 120 40 years ago, I only weighed 145 pounds, so I could carry full gas and a decent sized passenger. Now that my gross weight has increased considerably, I can only carry about 70 pounds will full tanks. So, yeah, it's an itty bitty airplane...
The seat mounts have four or five holes that fit retracting pins in the seat back and that is the only adjustment. With mine all the way in the most aft holes, I fit my 5' 9" butt in the plane after some pretty hilarious contorting and twisting. I'm too old for that stuff now...
The flaps are fairly effective and any more than 20 degrees burns off all the lift of the fabric wing as it quickly stalls during a three point landing. Wheel landings take a little bit of extra power, since the wing wants to quit flying unless you carry lots of extra speed. That make it an excellent crosswind/gusty airplane, however.
All these characteristics make it a great airplane for learning to fly. Flying a 150 after learning in a 140 will bore you...
Absolutely spot on!
Definitely on the nosewheel version boring you. I’m in a 172 club as well as my 140, once I got my 140 and went and got the club plane I did feel very bored flying her... but she has 180hp and fancy gadgetry in her so differebtvships for different missions but yes absolutely less “fun” to fly once ya fly the old Cessna tailwheels...