GoDores
Filing Flight Plan
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2018
- Messages
- 16
- Display Name
Display name:
GoDores
I just had my vacuum AI fail in flight. It’s the only vacuum driven instrument I have left and I’d like to get rid of the vacuum system.
I currently have dual Aspen 1000 PFD/MFD with the backup batteries. They are the older non-MAX versions for which the STC requires a backup AI. I don’t have any original steam gauges except the vacuum AI and an electric TC that drives the autopilot, which will stay.
The plan was to install an AV-30C with a field approval, or if that wouldn’t work, a G5. Avionics shop says field approval won’t work for the AV-30C because the STC is only for single engine airplanes, and the G5 won’t work because it’s only approved as a primary and not a backup AI. But they say I could use a GI275, which is about double the cost.
Is this accurate? If not, can anyone point me to actual FAA paperwork that would show my shop that one of the more reasonably priced options would be legal? It seems crazy that in the event the Aspens failed the FAA would rather I have a vacuum-driven AI than a G5 with airspeed and altitude information and a battery backup, but I recognize this may be the case unless I can prove otherwise.
Edit: plane is a PA-30.
I currently have dual Aspen 1000 PFD/MFD with the backup batteries. They are the older non-MAX versions for which the STC requires a backup AI. I don’t have any original steam gauges except the vacuum AI and an electric TC that drives the autopilot, which will stay.
The plan was to install an AV-30C with a field approval, or if that wouldn’t work, a G5. Avionics shop says field approval won’t work for the AV-30C because the STC is only for single engine airplanes, and the G5 won’t work because it’s only approved as a primary and not a backup AI. But they say I could use a GI275, which is about double the cost.
Is this accurate? If not, can anyone point me to actual FAA paperwork that would show my shop that one of the more reasonably priced options would be legal? It seems crazy that in the event the Aspens failed the FAA would rather I have a vacuum-driven AI than a G5 with airspeed and altitude information and a battery backup, but I recognize this may be the case unless I can prove otherwise.
Edit: plane is a PA-30.