Jay Honeck
Touchdown! Greaser!
Having just returned from our 27th Airventure, I can attest to the fact that it was well-attended. The numbers just released by EAA support that observation -- attendance rose 12% from 2008.
As importantly, it was conducted with very few "stupid pilot tricks" observed. To my knowledge there were few incidents, no accidents, and no fatalities, for which we are all grateful.
I am having trouble reconciling all of this with what we're observing and reading about with regard to GA. GA flying is down in double-digits, GA manufacturers are facing their worst year, ever, and I can attest to the fact that NO ONE is flying on most days in our neck of the woods. Our fly-in business at the hotel is at historic lows. (Well, especially now, with our airport closed for runway reconstruction... . But even before that our fly-in numbers were way down.)
Yet, despite all this, attendance at OSH was UP, and safer than ever. How is this possible?
Here are some other aspects of this question to ponder:
1. How is it possible that pilots who are flying fewer hours than ever were able to safely transition through the FISK approach, into the busiest airspace in the world, without incident? This, as opposed to prior years, when there were more hours flown yet more (and more serious) incidents?
2. How is it possible that every economic indicator shows GA (and the overall economy) in the dumpster, yet attendance at OSH rose 12% from last year?
This is an interesting -- and encouraging -- phenomenon. Long-time industry observers (like Flying Mag's J. Mac MacClellan) are as puzzled by this as I am.
Wot say the group?
As importantly, it was conducted with very few "stupid pilot tricks" observed. To my knowledge there were few incidents, no accidents, and no fatalities, for which we are all grateful.
I am having trouble reconciling all of this with what we're observing and reading about with regard to GA. GA flying is down in double-digits, GA manufacturers are facing their worst year, ever, and I can attest to the fact that NO ONE is flying on most days in our neck of the woods. Our fly-in business at the hotel is at historic lows. (Well, especially now, with our airport closed for runway reconstruction... . But even before that our fly-in numbers were way down.)
Yet, despite all this, attendance at OSH was UP, and safer than ever. How is this possible?
Here are some other aspects of this question to ponder:
1. How is it possible that pilots who are flying fewer hours than ever were able to safely transition through the FISK approach, into the busiest airspace in the world, without incident? This, as opposed to prior years, when there were more hours flown yet more (and more serious) incidents?
2. How is it possible that every economic indicator shows GA (and the overall economy) in the dumpster, yet attendance at OSH rose 12% from last year?
This is an interesting -- and encouraging -- phenomenon. Long-time industry observers (like Flying Mag's J. Mac MacClellan) are as puzzled by this as I am.
Wot say the group?