Tom Veatch
Filing Flight Plan
In an attempt to avoid hijack of the thread containing this post:
http://www.pilotsofamerica.com/forum/showpost.php?p=616651&postcount=42
The way I'm reading it: OP has a PP cert., therefore isn't a student pilot, but due to the "long hiatus", OP doesn't have a current BFR and cannot legally act as PIC. Hence the instructor is deemed to be PIC.
If that's a correct reading, what would be the situation if the OP met recent currency requirements, had a current BFR, and could legally act as PIC with passengers aboard? When flying under those conditions with an instructor aboard, i.e., instrument/commercial training, BFR renewal, refresher training, etc., would the instructor be automatically deemed to be PIC?
The circumstances interest me since I'm a PP/IR coming off a 30 year hiatus. For whatever it's worth, grandfathered for the complex/high performance/taildragger endorsements, and if I could find the documentation of my high altitude/pressure chamber training, might could grandfather that as well.
Within the last couple of days I received a 3rd Class Medical SI and as soon as it can be arranged, will be flying with an instructor. No question about the instructor being PIC in my case. About the only difference between me and a zero time student is I think I remember which end of the airplane goes first. (The end with that whirly-gig thing on it, right?)
The biggest changes since my last log entry in 1980 seem to be the change to ICAO airspace designations, GPS navigation, and, for good or evil, the influences of the patriot act, homeland security department, and the transportation security administration.
I've been doing some on-line study since starting the SI Medical process this past April; including most of the AOPA on-line, interactive courses and the "free" portions of all the on-line ground schools I've found. I'd be pleased to hear any other advice/recommendations that any of you might have.
http://www.pilotsofamerica.com/forum/showpost.php?p=616651&postcount=42
The instructor is deemed to be PIC in a training situation like this, and has the authority to make the final decisions. ...
The way I'm reading it: OP has a PP cert., therefore isn't a student pilot, but due to the "long hiatus", OP doesn't have a current BFR and cannot legally act as PIC. Hence the instructor is deemed to be PIC.
If that's a correct reading, what would be the situation if the OP met recent currency requirements, had a current BFR, and could legally act as PIC with passengers aboard? When flying under those conditions with an instructor aboard, i.e., instrument/commercial training, BFR renewal, refresher training, etc., would the instructor be automatically deemed to be PIC?
The circumstances interest me since I'm a PP/IR coming off a 30 year hiatus. For whatever it's worth, grandfathered for the complex/high performance/taildragger endorsements, and if I could find the documentation of my high altitude/pressure chamber training, might could grandfather that as well.
Within the last couple of days I received a 3rd Class Medical SI and as soon as it can be arranged, will be flying with an instructor. No question about the instructor being PIC in my case. About the only difference between me and a zero time student is I think I remember which end of the airplane goes first. (The end with that whirly-gig thing on it, right?)
The biggest changes since my last log entry in 1980 seem to be the change to ICAO airspace designations, GPS navigation, and, for good or evil, the influences of the patriot act, homeland security department, and the transportation security administration.
I've been doing some on-line study since starting the SI Medical process this past April; including most of the AOPA on-line, interactive courses and the "free" portions of all the on-line ground schools I've found. I'd be pleased to hear any other advice/recommendations that any of you might have.
Last edited: