Zeldman
Touchdown! Greaser!
I have heard of some states that if the defendant passes away before the end of the trial then the charges are dropped.
I have heard of some states that if the defendant passes away before the end of the trial then the charges are dropped.
That makes zero sense. Killing oneself should constitute a voluntary withdrawl of any pending appeals.
Not really, as distasteful as it is, it is the burden of the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the offender is guilty. They managed that in a trial, but that trial is subject to appeal. As long as the appeal is still in process then the defendant is still presumed innocent.
That doesn't make sense. I'm not saying that isn't the way it is, but once you are convicted you are guilty. An appeal doesn't erase guilt. It seems his situation now would be guilty until proven innocent, since he's been found guilty and appealing.
Yep. Some of my sarcasm has eluded the masses. Then again maybe I just ain't any good at it.
Look, I'm not a lawyer...
Well, do you at least play one on TV or at least stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night?
Nope, just a dumbass on the internet, lol.
Anyone think I might have been accidental?
There's some weird fascination with auto-eroticism involving asphyxiation.
No first-hand knowledge - at the Police Academy we had a rep from the Medical Examiners office show us some slides of accidental deaths from such things gone wrong.
Just a thought.
Anyone think it might have been accidental?
There's some weird fascination with auto-eroticism involving asphyxiation.
No first-hand knowledge - at the Police Academy we had a rep from the Medical Examiners office show us some slides of accidental deaths from such things gone wrong.
Just a thought.
Apparently, it protects the murderer's heirs from being sued by the victim's family. Completely illogical but that seems to be MA law according to what I heard on Sports talk radio this morning.If that happens then I hope the victims' families successfully sue his estate and get that money.
What I heard is that they can't just use the criminal proceedings as evidence in a civil trial. Instead they have to essentially prove his guilt from scratch, as if the criminal trial never happened. Fortunately for them, the standards of proof are lower in a civil trial then they are for criminal. It's just like how O.J. Simpson was found not guilty at his criminal trial and then found responsible for the deaths at a civil trial.Apparently, it protects the murderer's heirs from being sued by the victim's family. Completely illogical but that seems to be MA law according to what I heard on Sports talk radio this morning.
I believe that was how the lead singer of INXS died.
That's a good point, but they said they found him with John 3:16 written on his forehead with read ink and a bible opened to that verse.
Savage!
I thought he committed suicide by drug overdose?
Joni is dead.
Oh. Didn't she die several years ago? I was never a big fan. I never liked the high falsetto thing she tried to do sometimes.Joni Mitchell?
Oh. Didn't she die several years ago? I was never a big fan. I never liked the high falsetto thing she tried to do sometimes.
The found him with a noose around his neck and naked. They said drugs where in his system not that the drugs killed him..
As long as the appeal is still in process then the defendant is still presumed innocent.
No, that is not true. He was considered guilty after the verdict. Otherwise, he would have been walking the streets rather than sitting in prison serving a sentence. As the "appellant," the burden was on him to prove the conviction should be overturned.
As a layman, I can see the value of this law if someone comes to an untimely end either due to malfeasance or natural causes. For suicide the conviction should stick.