steingar
Taxi to Parking
Relationships require skills and efforts to maintain, because people change over time. If the OP expected her husband to remain the same exact man she married, she was an enormously naive bride and has become a naive wife.
One relationship skill is finding ways to share or at least coexist with one's partners avocations. Now if that avocation is destructive, like gambling or narcotics, I suspect that a partner is in the right suggesting abatement. Flying may be expensive, but it is not in any way destructive, rather the opposite.
If the expense of an avocation is causing continual financial erosion, then a partner has a clear right to confront the situation. Keep in mind that at that point, it is the financial erosion, and not the avocation which is at issue.
If the avocation itself is causing the friction, there may be irreconcilable issues. The OP has already learned this, several members of this board have gratefully dissolved their relationships because their partners could not reconcile themselves to volant activities.
The relationship skill is in preventing such issues from becoming irreconcilable. Communication is invaluable here, and it would benefit the husband to pen up some about his flying activities. There is a more complex dynamic though, I don't like discussing my flying activities with aviation detractors and I suspect the subject of this thread is similar. Life is too short.
Women may value relationships, but they're just as likely to exhibit poor relationship skills if not more so. Insisting that a spouse not engage in an avocation just because it is for some reason distasteful is a very poor relationship skill indeed.
One relationship skill is finding ways to share or at least coexist with one's partners avocations. Now if that avocation is destructive, like gambling or narcotics, I suspect that a partner is in the right suggesting abatement. Flying may be expensive, but it is not in any way destructive, rather the opposite.
If the expense of an avocation is causing continual financial erosion, then a partner has a clear right to confront the situation. Keep in mind that at that point, it is the financial erosion, and not the avocation which is at issue.
If the avocation itself is causing the friction, there may be irreconcilable issues. The OP has already learned this, several members of this board have gratefully dissolved their relationships because their partners could not reconcile themselves to volant activities.
The relationship skill is in preventing such issues from becoming irreconcilable. Communication is invaluable here, and it would benefit the husband to pen up some about his flying activities. There is a more complex dynamic though, I don't like discussing my flying activities with aviation detractors and I suspect the subject of this thread is similar. Life is too short.
Women may value relationships, but they're just as likely to exhibit poor relationship skills if not more so. Insisting that a spouse not engage in an avocation just because it is for some reason distasteful is a very poor relationship skill indeed.