A ride in a U-2. Can you go eleven hours without touching your face?

John Baker

Final Approach
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
7,471
Location
San Diego, California
Display Name

Display name:
John Baker
I just received this as an e-mail. It is a free ride in the U-2.

-John


Commentary:
You can see why the U-2 is considered the most difficult plane in the world to fly. Each pilot has a co-pilot, who chases the plane on the runway in a sports car. Most of the cars are either Pontiac GTOs or Chevrolet Camaros - the Air Force buys American. The chase cars talk the pilot down as he lands on bicycle-style landing gear.
In that spacesuit, the pilot in the plane simply cannot get a good view of the runway. Upon takeoff, the wings on this plane, which extend 103 feet from tip to tip, literally flap. To stabilize the wings on the runway, two pogo sticks on wheels prop up the ends of the wings.

As the plane flies away, the pogo sticks drop off. The plane climbs at an amazing rate of nearly 10,000 feet a minute. Within about four minutes, I was at 40,000 feet, higher than any commercial airplane. We kept going up to 13 miles above Earth's surface.

You get an incredible sensation up there. As you look out the windows, it feels like you're floating, it feels like you're not moving, but you're actually going 500 mph.. The U-2 was built to go higher than any other aircraft. In fact today, more than 50 years since it went into production, the U-2 flies higher than any aircraft in the world with the exception of the Lockheed YF-12A ("SR-71") and the space shuttle.

It is flying more missions and longer missions than ever before - nearly 70 missions a month over Iraq and Afghanistan , an operational tempo that is unequaled in history. The pilots fly for 11 hours at a time, sometimes more than 11 hours up there alone. By flying so high, the U-2 has the capability of doing reconnaissance over a country without actually violating its airspace. It can look off to the side, peering 300 miles or more inside a country without actually flying over it. It can "see" in the dark and through clouds.

It can also "hear," intercepting conversations 14 miles below. The U-2, an incredible piece of history and also a current piece of high technology.

Enjoy the ride in a Lockheed U-2

Click Here for a Ride In a U2 - Have Your Sound Onhttp://www.wimp.com/breathtakingfootage/
http://www.wimp.com/breathtakingfootage/
http://www.wimp.com/breathtakingfootage/
http://www.wimp.com/breathtakingfootage/

 
> Most of the cars are either Pontiac GTOs or Chevrolet Camaros - the
> Air Force buys American

Not.

The GTO was mfg'd in Australia. The Camaro is mfg'd in Canada.


 
> Most of the cars are either Pontiac GTOs or Chevrolet Camaros - the
> Air Force buys American

Not.

The GTO was mfg'd in Australia. The Camaro is mfg'd in Canada.



I think its an old reference, or an old article when the first generation of these muscle cars came out of Detroit.
 
> Most of the cars are either Pontiac GTOs or Chevrolet Camaros - the
> Air Force buys American

Not.

The GTO was mfg'd in Australia. The Camaro is mfg'd in Canada.

One day, the pain of this new information will pass. We just need some time to heal and recover.

-John
 
That's pretty amazing. I wonder what kind of fuel efficiency they get up there.
 
I just received this as an e-mail. It is a free ride in the U-2.

-John


Commentary:
You can see why the U-2 is considered the most difficult plane in the world to fly. Each pilot has a co-pilot, who chases the plane on the runway in a sports car. Most of the cars are either Pontiac GTOs or Chevrolet Camaros - the Air Force buys American. The chase cars talk the pilot down as he lands on bicycle-style landing gear.
In that spacesuit, the pilot in the plane simply cannot get a good view of the runway. Upon takeoff, the wings on this plane, which extend 103 feet from tip to tip, literally flap. To stabilize the wings on the runway, two pogo sticks on wheels prop up the ends of the wings.

As the plane flies away, the pogo sticks drop off. The plane climbs at an amazing rate of nearly 10,000 feet a minute. Within about four minutes, I was at 40,000 feet, higher than any commercial airplane. We kept going up to 13 miles above Earth's surface.

You get an incredible sensation up there. As you look out the windows, it feels like you're floating, it feels like you're not moving, but you're actually going 500 mph.. The U-2 was built to go higher than any other aircraft. In fact today, more than 50 years since it went into production, the U-2 flies higher than any aircraft in the world with the exception of the Lockheed YF-12A ("SR-71") and the space shuttle.

It is flying more missions and longer missions than ever before - nearly 70 missions a month over Iraq and Afghanistan , an operational tempo that is unequaled in history. The pilots fly for 11 hours at a time, sometimes more than 11 hours up there alone. By flying so high, the U-2 has the capability of doing reconnaissance over a country without actually violating its airspace. It can look off to the side, peering 300 miles or more inside a country without actually flying over it. It can "see" in the dark and through clouds.

It can also "hear," intercepting conversations 14 miles below. The U-2, an incredible piece of history and also a current piece of high technology.

Enjoy the ride in a Lockheed U-2

Click Here for a Ride In a U2 - Have Your Sound Onhttp://www.wimp.com/breathtakingfootage/
http://www.wimp.com/breathtakingfootage/
http://www.wimp.com/breathtakingfootage/
http://www.wimp.com/breathtakingfootage/



I'm sorta fuzzy on the point of this post. John is usually posting how the US is going down the tubes and our government blows and what not. No offense, I'm just not seeing what the point of this thread is. Anti-U2? Pro-U2? Just a neat informational story about a U2 flight?

Guess I'm just waiting for the shoe to drop on how the US government sux.
 
Ha, the one that landed gear up did the best!
I wonder if it would be a reasonable approach to simple force a ground loop at the earliest opportunity and get it over with?!

(ref: OG's link on U2 "landings".)
 
I'm sorta fuzzy on the point of this post. John is usually posting how the US is going down the tubes and our government blows and what not. No offense, I'm just not seeing what the point of this thread is. Anti-U2? Pro-U2? Just a neat informational story about a U2 flight?

Guess I'm just waiting for the shoe to drop on how the US government sux.

It was posted for it's entertainment value, nothing more.

I do not, nor have I ever claimed our form of government "sux", as you so succulently put it.

What I am fond of railing about is bureaucracies and bureaucratisim in general, in not only government agencies, but private companies as well.

Nothing can be less productive, nor as expensive as a bureaucracy. If anything will bring this country down, it will be the thousands of people who actually produce something, trying to support the ever growing ranks of the millions of bureaucrats who don't.

It's like trying to slow down the Mississippi river with a tea spoon. Sooner or later they are going to realize what a waste of effort it actually is, and just give up.



-John
 
Last edited:
I've got a friend who is an ex-U2 pilot. He wanted to fly my Navion and I pointed out my open pilot clause required 25 hours of retract time. I asked if the wheels fall off of your plane, does that count as retract time?
 
I've got a friend who is an ex-U2 pilot. He wanted to fly my Navion and I pointed out my open pilot clause required 25 hours of retract time. I asked if the wheels fall off of your plane, does that count as retract time?
LOL ... :D
 
I've got a friend who is an ex-U2 pilot. He wanted to fly my Navion and I pointed out my open pilot clause required 25 hours of retract time. I asked if the wheels fall off of your plane, does that count as retract time?

It would qualify as "detract-able time" the new endorsement...
 
I'm sorta fuzzy on the point of this post. John is usually posting how the US is going down the tubes and our government blows and what not. No offense, I'm just not seeing what the point of this thread is. Anti-U2? Pro-U2? Just a neat informational story about a U2 flight?

Guess I'm just waiting for the shoe to drop on how the US government sux.

This is not the Spin Zone, Captain.
 
Hey, the U-2 keeps replacing all the things that were supposed to replace it (SR-71, predator, etc...)
 
The original video is a clip from a BBC show "James May at the Edge of Space" - if you get a chance, watch the whole thing....
 
The original video is a clip from a BBC show "James May at the Edge of Space" - if you get a chance, watch the whole thing....

Is that James in the video?

Also, I'm only 2 minutes in, but the radio work is mixed with background music.

Guess what I heard?

"NorCal Approach....."

They are here! NorCal has a large range of areas, but this plane is near me!!!

Pretty cool.
 
Interestingly, I met a former U-2 pilot while flying a charter. Now he flies a Lancair IV-P.

He said that one of the things that keeps the U-2 in business is its economy. 30 years ago (when he was flying them), an SR-71 cost $150,000 per hour to operate (in ~1980 dollars). The reason was because 5 tankers needed to be in the air whenever the SR-71 was flying, not to mention the general cost of fuel and maintenance on the plane.

The U-2, by comparison, he claimed cost $1,500 per hour to operate.

Factoring in inflation, that would put a U-2's hourly cost at roughly similar to a Gulfstream. That's a hell of a bargain. I don't know if what he said is true or not, but certainly interesting.
 
Back
Top