Sexual assault is a very broad term that also includes verbal, visual and sexual harassment is it's definition. "Nappy headed Ho's" falls into the definition of sexual assault.
I think Scott is confusing sexual harassment with sexual assault.
"The legal definition of criminal sexual assault is any genital, oral, or anal penetration by a part of the accused's body or by an object, using force or without the victim's consent." (American Medical Association. Strategies for the treatment and prevention of sexual assault. Chicago: AMA, 1995) "
Sexual Harassment is not included in the legal definition of sexual assault, but sexual assault can be a part of sexual harassment. Within employment or school settings, sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination that is prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 under the Federal law. Title VII defines sexual harassment as 'unwelcome' sexual conduct that is a term or condition of employment (29 C.F.R. 1604. 11a)." (
http://sexualassault.rutgers.edu/definition.htm) In addition, most states also define something called criminal sexual contact or conduct, which includes things like "intentional, non-consensual touching by the victim or actor, either directly or through clothing, of a victim's or actor's sexual organs, genital area, anal area, inner thigh, groin, buttock or breast, for the purpose of degrading or humiliating the victim or sexually arousing or sexually gratifying the actor." (NJSA 2C:14-3).
My gut feeling is that Aunt Peggy's number of 1 in 10 women having been the victim of sexual
assault/contact as defined above is accurate, or even underestimating the actual incidence due to underreporting. I would guess that the percentage of women who have been victims of sexual
harassment of the verbal and visual sort described by Scott is nearly 100%, but I haven't done the research to support that.
In any event, I can understand the concern of any woman who is contemplating going for a drive in a car with a man she doesn't know from Adam, especially if there is no safety zone around them. OTOH, Sheri's point about FBO's not being where men looking for sexual victims hang out is well taken. To a certain extent, if the FBO knows the person, you have an indication of trust by someone you must trust at least somewhat or you wouldn't let them service and mind your airplane. Strategies such as letting the FBO know who you went off with and what time you're due back, or letting the driver know you're leaving an electronic trail of bread crumbs are good risk reducers, but at the end of the day, it's an on-the-spot risk analysis with no clear predetermined answer.