Left number is speed, right is altitude, middle number is radar altimeter. The goal is to fly the small circle in the bigger circle. I'm not sure why there HUD on civilian aircraft. The only thing I can think of is so they can shoot approaches to lower minimums but the 737 can autoland so it's not really necessary.Definitely cool.
Now, how can I figure out what I was looking at? Lots of symbols, numbers and etc.
Left number is speed, right is altitude, middle number is radar altimeter. The goal is to fly the small circle in the bigger circle. I'm not sure why there HUD on civilian aircraft. The only thing I can think of is so they can shoot approaches to lower minimums but the 737 can autoland so it's not really necessary.
Stupid pilotsAt least it doesn't call you a retard like those arrogant Frenchmen do.
but the 737 can autoland so it's not really necessary.
I'm pretty sure it's there. I just don't know where.Is Angle of Attack shown on there somewhere?
That makes senseThe issue with autoland is that few runways are CAT III certified. HUD allows lower minimums at more airports. It's also a safety issue. There is no looking back and forth inside and outside on CAT I and CAT II approaches.
Is Angle of Attack shown on there somewhere?
I'm not sure why there HUD on civilian aircraft.
Where is the Round Out and Flair in the landing? I always thought Airliners come in nose High and touch down on the mains first. This looked like a 3 point landing. What do I know. I'm low time Cessna pilot
Go watch jetliners land, they come down short final already in a nose high attitude. Some will rotate the nose slightly higher just before touchdown, some not.
Go watch jetliners land, they come down short final already in a nose high attitude. Some will rotate the nose slightly higher just before touchdown, some not.
Technology is great. Those engineers are geniusesI was surprised to learn the HUD system is in it's own little world, independent of other instrument displays and systems on the aircraft.
Sure looks crowded, particularly at the center of the screen where I'd think you'd want less obstruction, not more.
Yea my dad says it's not too bad. I think he told me Delta makes them log 8 HUD approaches each month. I'm not sure if it's each pilot or just the plane has to log the approaches to make sure the systems are alright.It's actually ok, real vision doesn't work quite the same way as video. You end up looking right through all that and "flip back and forth" very easily and naturally.
That's mostly true, although take a look at something without slats, such as a CRJ-200. I've never flown a CRJ, but the first time I ended up on the jumpseat of a -200 I about shat my pants on short final.
I knew you'd be here to chime in! What is SW's procedure with the HUD? Do you guys always use it on takeoff and landing regardless of conditions?That looks a lot (but not exactly) like my "office"!
It's actually ok, real vision doesn't work quite the same way as video. You end up looking right through all that and "flip back and forth" very easily and naturally.
So they come in nose down more like a GA aircraft?
So getting the same view on an SVT panel then switching to a clean window may still be preferable.
The only thing I think it would be nice to have in a small HUD is AoA.
No idea what an SVT panel is, nor a "clean" window!
Our huds don't have AOA in them like the one in the vid.
No idea what an SVT panel is, nor a "clean" window!
Our huds don't have AOA in them like the one in the vid.
SVT, Synthetic Vision Technology, a forward looking 3D eVFR view ahead with the same type data overlay and predictor indication as with the HUD.
A clean window is exactly that, a clean piece of glass with nothing to obstruct the view.
I'm not likely to see that in my career!
That either!