Search results

I had posted a site that listed the NTSB preliminary report and it's been deleted so maybe I wasn't supposed to use that site I'm going to try again to provide the additional information of the preliminary investigation...

This is what a fuel supported aviation fire looks like

This is what I suppose a grass fire looks like

Thanks I appreciate the information you provide. I'm not all hung up about the fuel issue other than the fact that the run out ofthe crash site is didn't have a visual of fuel fire that burned everything up more grass fire the way I saw it. When we look at that kind of speed and the chart I had...

Somewhat not someone. Voice typing on the phone

In that picture was that a someone normal descent pitch angle and if so approximately what was the rate of descent and the airspeed? Not knowing what I'm talking about it looks a little shallow which would say probably higher speed and less vertical descent rate.

Is that out of Rayford(sp) by chance?

English version You drop your jumpers and configure for your descent and start down.You run out of juice and slight Oh Frack Over speed-heavy hand and suffer whatever From Tools comment upstream "At about 2gs, idle, prop set for about 1800rpm, 160 kts, I get about 6k fpm down." Get me a link to...

See if you can open this link.woudnt work check the screeshot Expand the smoke shot obvious grass fire Expand the road shot shows demolition dirt,not a airplane landing attempt,and the remains-faster then a speeding rock

Slight difference- speed shows the drop the jumpers- still have fuel nose it over to go get another load or gas up first. I don't know the tanks on it but how low and what pitch angle causes loss. It either structural by the jumpers (possible but maybe should hear about that from the skydive...

I had been using the same chart and looking at that on what I would approximate the first 15 seconds of descent looked somewhat normal I'm still guessing nose trimmed down loss of power from lack of fuel, standing on your nose 4 3 to 5 seconds response correction what would your airspeed be?

"They haven't done interviews or any actual unbiased analysis." Certifiable Waist your own time debating A J

"I don't know about the first party in your statement"

I hate starting fights but sometimes statements require a stand. I don't know about the first party in your statement but by the second party and your statement it shows you are definitely a certified liar. "But Gryder and Jones have nothing to back up what they speculate. So that makes them a...

Dumb spaghetti just won't stick.

I think we're getting pretty close I've seen some more pictures of the fire around the crash site and it's all white smoke from the grass fire not petroleum smoke black from fuel. I'm still going with ran out of juice on the descent and slow to catch the correction excessive airspeed and either...

How did you arrive at that number?

I had to go back up thread a little bit and look but at nowhere that I say the plane was coming down at 16,500 ft a minute I did make reference to the last flight to where information that showed it at I think 7,100 ft or something on its last reading. A pilot or was a pilot I was surprised to...

"Probably not a glitch. With a 16,500fpm descent rate and increasing, and returns every 15-30 seconds, the aircraft probably hit the ground after the 7,100 ft. reading before another data point could be recorded." I didn't see that comment before I posted but if that is correct then things...

Hope I can post this link it's from a news site https://www.wgrz.com/article/news/local/ntsb-investigating-plane-crash-youngstown-new-york/71-5ae34cfa-0cf9-48c1-a325-357d877d3332 and if it does post scroll down and then view the video you'll see the area fairly clearly where the crash took place...