Search results

1956 Cessna 172. This is the 732nd 172 ever made.

Just google searched it, there's quite a few pictures of it you can find.

I got two MX-300's when a friend did an avionics upgrade. They were both working fine when removed. They come with trays and the back connectors. One is missing a knob. I'll sell outright if somebody makes a good offer, but what I'd really like to do is trade these two radios for one TKM...

I thought that was the case when I had a back passenger, but figured maybe it was just in my head.

This was the first control line plane I remember us getting.

Very nice, thanks for posting.

Cheaper Flight School. Come down and see us, we're Cheaper!

14,000 hours is a lot of possible metal fatigue issues for over 100k. I'd rather spend that on a RV thats a year or two old with less than a 1000 TTAF.

We've got the same situation. Partner and I bought into a 172 that a lady owns at our field. She'd owned the plane for 14 years and still hasn't got her license.

American made is such a grey area anymore. I work for a major auto manufacturer that sounds like Yoda. We have 5 car plants in the U.S., 3 powertrain plants, and another service parts plant. Yeh, the company is from Japan originally, but those plants and all the tier suppliers that make parts...

If it was I'd go vacuum out my 172 and take some pictures!

Wouldn't change a thing, I think it looks really good. I haven't seen any done as a full cutout of the state, now I've got to make one of those! I know what you mean about merging the sectionals, we're on the edge of one here in central Ky so I had to do the merging as well. Not poking...

FYI, I used the FAA sectionals, (had to combine two), and then I sent it to walgreens and they printed it out for me. It's really cheap, I think it cost me 30 bucks for a 24x36 print. Also you don't have to drill/cut holes in the picture, the LEDs will shine right through it. It looks much...

I used this website to help me build the one I made. https://www.livesectional.com/

My home airport's runway is still covered by a sheet of ice, so I did some 3d printing to get rid of those crappy velcroed PTT switches that move around everywhere that our 172 came with.

Oddly enough, they were invented to build aircraft and helicopter parts.

You find flying related things to do. Made these chocks for my plane yesterday and today. A CNC and some resin will make you look like an expert woodworker even when you aren't.

The oddest part of the DPE situation to me is that it's encouraged and widely known to pay them in cash. No where else I can think of are the feds cool with not getting their cut of the money.

Gotcha. I searched this site for more info, and I found the Jim Weir someone else mentioned. Here's the thread he was on https://www.pilotsofamerica.com/community/threads/non-tso-for-certified-aircraft.104981/ and he said ... There IS NO such thing as experimental avionics. And for part 91...

That's not what it says in that article though. The article states.. Means that the equipment need not have TSO approval, but that it meets requirements set by the TSO. That's my confusion.