Search results

  1. AerospaceLogic

    Fuel flow monitor

    There are three possible outputs from the CiES sender: 1. Digital (actually a frequency modulated waveform). This is the default output and works with our FL20xD instrument, 2. Voltage - optional. Not sure on the exact range - check with CiES on this but people use either our FL21x or FL25x...
  2. AerospaceLogic

    Fuel flow monitor

    Your accuracy "should" be the same however I would strongly recommend the digital over voltage. Signal loss is almost non-existant and there always seems to be some issue with the analog install/configuration as it is not the standard install. Don't take my comment wrong, all will work, it just...
  3. AerospaceLogic

    Fuel flow monitor

    The FL202 uses the existing resistive fuel senders. Either already installed in your aircraft (OEM) or if they need it, overhauled. The FL202D requires the CiES senders and these must be purchased directly from CiES.
  4. AerospaceLogic

    Fuel flow monitor

    Stewartb, Your fuel instrument does not have any issues (please read on ..). You state that you have installed it with McFarlane senders, This is the problem. Please don't get me wrong, they make fantastic senders but they are very different from the original senders. Our instruments are...
  5. AerospaceLogic

    Installation Question: Fuel Flow Monitor

    Ok guys and gals lets clear up a few things. The fuel instrument discussed here is the new generation FL202 NOT the FL-100. There is no comparison between the two. The new generation FL202 uses a completely different calibration procedure where most tanks can be calibrated in under one...
  6. AerospaceLogic

    Installation Question: Fuel Flow Monitor

    Lynn, We have been selling (amongst other products) fuel level instruments since 2000 and have thousands of them installed worldwide. What you have is definitely a fuel level instrument and not a fuel flow. If either you or your mechanic have any questions please feel free to call our...
Back
Top