Search results

I PMed the author a while back and never got a reply. I am still looking at my options.

Interested, PM-ed

Could you elaborate on the cost?

My thinking is that the FADEC will not only reduce workload, but also would reduce the training time for the PPL and will lower the entering barrier to the GA. (dunno why the font size is messed up)

It amuses me how a rather new company can outsell well-established heavy weights. I think it's partially dues to the ages old 172 design vs modern composite airframe.

No so long ago airplanes had a flight engineer controlling the ... hmm... engines somewhere in the back of the cabin. He was replaced by the FADEC. While I certainly can appreciate the simplicity, I would also like to see some progress. So far the only explanation seems to be the high cost of...

RTOS are well understood and have been around for thousands of years

That's a very bad reason. :(

I am curious why there is a lack of FADECs in general aviation? I know there are some planes with FADEC, but majority still use separate throttle/pitch/mixture controls.

Wouldn't there be a chance of a nice roll for a small plane because of the huge wingtip vortices after an airliner?

Interested, sent PM.

Wait, you're young yet.

I did an introductory flight with Adv. Aviation and liked them. LZU/location is perfect for me. Any particular instructor (or any instructor to avoid)?

Teddy: Curious what is the outcome of the training. Would you recommend them?