Search results

The final report came out recently: https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/106491/pdf (or search CAROL for 1867h) It doesn't really add anything or explore my concerns about how the pilot's story didn't add up. It feels like the NTSB round-shouldered...

Made my ceiling rumble for a second there.

It’s a good story but what is the bottom line for pilots?

Part 141, if applicable.

Unless you are Part 141 which has a slightly different requirement.

Make a YouTube video so a student pilot with 3 hours TT can argue with you then report you to the FAA.

Pitch from 63 to 79 should have occurred once above all obstacles, so approximately by 200 feet. To realize speed hasn't reached 70 knots at nearly 500 feet makes no sense, unless you are asleep for like 30 seconds. Also, where did 70 knots even come from? Is that written somewhere?

Does this work? https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/106491/pdf If not, go to Carol simple search here and search for aircraft registration 1867H: https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-main-public/landing-page

The NSTB preliminary report came out a couple of days ago. The pilot's statements don't add up to me, as someone who's familiar with the club's checklists, the airplane, and Lee airport. The airplane was apparently recovered from the creek for further investigation. I found a couple of errors...

I've rented that plane many times. I won't be renting it again.

Us pilots appreciate that twin, but your nutritionist might have a few words to say about leaning.

Hurry up and eat it before the FAA gets involved.

You can fulfill the cross country time requirements in a simulator so long as all of your solo flying after that is also in a simulator for the rest of your flying career.

Last time you updated the management council I felt like PoA selected a fine group of individuals so I'll respond in kind. Donated a bit and I'll tow a banner over next SuperBowl which says "PilotsOfAmerica" if I'm not too busy.

I've received conflicting feedback from instructors regarding how big your deviation needs to be from direct before you should tell the controller about your non-direct route. I'm not familiar with your area, but I think I've got the gist of your issue from your post and it sounds like you...

If the FAA just called them licenses instead of certificates like common sense would dictate, then there would probably be much less confusion about ratings vs certificates/licenses...

There’s nothing wrong with liking statistics.

Sad, but good job by all involved. Anyone can drop dead at any time no matter their age or apparent health. All discussions about regulations and procedures need to start from that assumption.

Yeah, when a pilot makes a mistake, that’s the worst time to drop the professionalism.

210/312. What do I win?