Search results

Street sushi? The gift that keeps on giving. :)

I'm just going to repeat this picture so I don't have to see the other pictures when I open up Tapatalk.

That's the first thing I thought of. Fortunately we have the ACA so there should be no worries that you will lose the doctor that you have built a long-term relationship with.

Congratulations. You may have just started the longest thread in POA history with a question like that. My answer: have you seen the number of pilots that have suffered from a severe case of cranial-rectal inversion?

Stunning, isn't it?

And now you get to subsidize people who DO "buy" insurance. Congratulations.

And keep imagining that your hero Obama and his democrat sycophants have done nothing different to the health insurance industry. Nope. Nothing to see here. Move along. BCBS is canceling plans in Texas as a result of Obamacare? Hey, it's not Obamacare's problem. It's everyone else's problem...

I do. Do you? Apparently not. Pre ACA, insurance companies had some regulations with which to live by, and they competed against each other for business; if they were bad at business or paying claims, they lost business and may go TU. Post ACA, insurance companies are mandated by law to...

Free market? With government-imposed coverages? Oh, that's rich. :rolleyes:

Except for a few concierge docs in DC to take care of Congress and their staff - they just can't be bothered with the same type of medical care as the surfs.

Umm, what?!?!?!?!? All on its own? WTF? Is this the Pilot in Command?

Oh my God is that beautiful!

I'm in a similar situation, and use your method of self evaluation, but mostly with bourbon.

Agreed!

Christie

Shipley's blueberry donuts. I've never tasted any better. This one was in Starkville, MS.

You're exactly correct. I saw that when I researched whether Merrimac had a "k" in its name. I didn't have time to research the Monitor vs Merrimac story that I recalled from my history, so I just went with Merrimac. Damn I hate guys like you. :D

Pfft. They just pulled the plans off of the CSS Merrimac, circa 1862.

Simply as in a "simple" ban on some guns based on their cosmetics. That's simple alright. Simple minded. We went though that for a 10-year period. It made zero change in the crime stats. So why is it that some want to do the exact same thing?

That's at least three posts where you used the term "legal". Can you support that it's legal to convert a semi-auto AR to a select fire or full auto weapon?