Search results

"When" IS the operative word, not "how high". So, here's how it should go: "Power off, one thousand one, one thousand two, one thousand three, one thousand four, one thousand five, one thousand six, one thousand seven, chirp, chirp."

"Airport's in sight, requesting the visual for 36."

You SO inspire me to have the last word! :) Suppose this feeder route of which you speak has a dogleg. And you didn't include it in your route description, since you said it occurs after the last fix. Do you fly directly to the geographic center of the airport instead of via the charted feeder...

Duh, the same reason I did before RNAV.

How else would you get there then? If the destination airport is the clearance limit and your plane isn't equipped to overfly it using RNAV and if lost comm rules apply equally to all IFR aircraft regardless of how they're equipped — the only way in common for all aircraft to get to the...

Not from "any random location" — you're obliged by the rule to fly the cleared/flight planned route. Presumably, that route description terminates at a location (fix) where you have the ability to safely continue your navigation to an IAF. Once at the IAF, you may descend as the enroute portion...

Still more than a thousand, but you're missing the point. The rule wasn't made in anticipation of any pilot flying over the airport before executing an approach. Why would you even want to do that for an RNAV (GPS), though you could? Fudging your ETE to artificially create an arrival time that...

I'm saying you DO have navigation but can't fly to the airport without an SIAP. Think VOR only. You can end your filed route description after any fix (or no fix at all) with "direct", but that doesn't mean you should go direct to the airport if you're cleared to your destination and only have...

No, you said "Assuming you filed a flight plan with an ETE and were issued a clearance stating the destination, you have a clearance limit…." The whole point of my cited post is that "clearance limit" only makes sense if it means "holding fix" which is what it historically did mean. If your...

:rofl:

With all due respect, you're as confused as the Chief Counsel. I recently tried to explain, again, the history of this rule as one who's lived through the evolution of it in real time. At the time, during examiner recurrent training and annual simulator recurrent training the new changes were...

This video is the best I've seen on the matter: Dr. Ahlskog of the Mayo Clinic discusses dosing in the last half of the video. He wrote at least two books — one for clinicians and one for patients. His lecture helped me lobby for more Sinemet when her neuro-psychiatrist was reluctant to...

I've been kept pretty busy for the past year helping an old girlfriend who was diagnosed last Thanksgiving with Parkinson's. After she had a DatScan, Lewy Body Dementia was the updated diagnosis. I think I could write a book after all the hours and hours of research I've done trying to...

You mean like the nightly news?

Without holding instructions and an EFC when cleared to the destination — there's no place nor time to hold until. Lost comm procedures specifically include radar environments. They don't include GPS.

Hey, hey, hey... It has a camera with optical recognition: https://www.foxnews.com/tech/naomi-campbell-rocks-screenless-wearable-ai-pin-sneaky-sci-fi-twist . Facial recognition next, for different kinds of "characters"?

I agree.

If you're behind a locked door that would work. If you are walking along and someone takes a hammer to you or suddenly puts a gun or knife to your throat, chances are YOUR gun isn't going to make a difference anyway. Do you expect the creep to stand by and wait for you while you get your gun out...

That was and still is covered. If there is no EFC you aren't supposed to hold, else when would you be expected to leave?