Search results

Dear TCABM and Kevin. Oh My Gosh... What disaster? Oh what my question about an IFR C-152 with 2 G5's and a G423W with LEVEL flight indication about 7-8 degrees nose up. I did bring it to an authorized maintainer, a very experienced AI / A&P Gentleman, who is part of our flight club. After...

Thanks Nauga... the last sentence from my long story I hit upon PIN 3 was grounded. I missed it because I did not make the harness only modified or salvaged the existing one. Also the LPM ground went from female pin to other ground lug splice. I removed pun. The SFD2 went over my head. I just...

Bought a Used G5 out of an Experimental and assumed it was experimental. PN 011-03809-00. I first got tipped off when I went in to Config >> Device Info >> Installation Type (drop down). There were three selection Standalone / Certified / G3X back up. Hummm. The SW was out of date when I got...

Wow PoA never ceases to amaze me. Besides the sarcasm and thread drift*, I have successfully been teaching and flying the said C182K (which has 110 mph Vfe limit unlike late model C-182's) clean as described above on Final Approach Segment very nicely. With my OCD about following rules and...

What are you talking about? No where did stall come into it. At no time are you below 1.3 Vso on approach. 90kts clean is 43 mph over Vso of 67mph for C182K (60mph flaps extended). So 90 kts is almost 1.6x Vso!!! Stall is not an issue clean. Once you "break out" on an instrument approach you...

C-182*, IAP, final approach segment (90kts, 470 fps descent), What power setting do you use (MAP) and flap configuration (Clean, 10 Deg, 20 Deg) Estimating: IAF & IF segments 16" to 18" clean (90 kts level) Final 14" to 15" w/ 10 Deg flaps on final (90 kts, 470 fpm descent) * I am flying a...

You have made several incorrect and misleading statements. The REGS and INTENT of XC are clear. Adding words or making up appeal to authority logical fallacies', FAA SAYS SO, with no Ref, is wrong. I talked to the FAA and DPE. Over flight of airport to fly an approach to missed approach (not...

".....as long as you eventually make it to the other end"? Where does it say that? You inserted your own words. REG "Conducted in an appropriate aircraft. Includes a point of landing that is at least a straight line distance of more than 50 NM from the point of departure" I admire how sure...

I have things to do, I have with student then a trip. If you can't my position, legal, conservative then that is on you. I reject your opinion and my right to use my own after 15,000 hrs, 5 FAA pilot ratings, 4 typees, 2 Gnd, 2000 hrs dual both GA and Airline. I don't need to agree with you...

flyingcheesehead, great reply. Some of the others are opinion and some snide remarks. Prove it show me in the regulations the LETTER of the law and intent? People are coming up with all kinds of creative interpretations that do NOT follow the INTENT of the REG... What do you think CROSS...

Ha ha? No CGUMPS is not a flow its a verbal neumonic checklist. Its a MEMORIZED CHECK LIST. The flow is NOT exactly in order of FLOW. S check list does not have to be printed. Memory items like 5 T's, 5 C's, or CIGARS.are great. The later CIGARS is pre takeoff done on tsxi down to R, run up...

Thanks for the criticism. Did yiu read it? Do you have feedback from FAA or DPE? Give you 2 examples one is ok per Reg but does not meet the INTENT. The 2nd example is wrong and sed this ligged by students wrong. 1) Take off A go to B 51nm, land, takeoff return directly to A. Don't land...

Hey, thanks for the criticism. Duly noted, but I want it to be very clear and precise.

Pvt Pilot Training for Inst Rating. As many pilots starting their INST PILOT - AIRPLANE rating, need PIC Cross Country, 50 hrs, Post PVT (although the SOLO student cross country counts). THIS IS FOR INST RATNG. This scenario is airport A, B, C.... Shape of a triangle. A>B 57nm (base of triangle...

Your gratuities tolling full of self promotion (your face can not be unseen), massive strawman argument and non sequitur is spectacular. You are a master debater, clearly. We are talking a young pilot being lead astray by a beach bum in Hawaii who does part time part 91 sight seeing ("sure kid"...

OH MY GOSH,... We are not talking PART 141. You are making STRAWMAN arguments again. You are saying On Line Courses, "Ground School" are not Part 141. NO KIDDING. :rolleyes: You win. You are a winner and have told me. How could I be so wrong. Does it matter? No. What counts is meeting the FAR's...

Troll much? What false statement be spacific? I am busy. I actually fly planes at work, one I own and club planes. You are a waste of my time. His log book is cleaned up. Done. Questions?What is your point ? Are you sad need a hug? I'm happy and trolls matter not.

Reading comprehension much. Yes if with a CFI you could as I stated log noth PIC both dual. No you can not fly legally solo as PIC a C182 w/o high performance endorsement. READ the regulation (unless grandfathered in). I have done +30 high performance and complex SEL endorsements. Hi Perf take...

Hey guys and gals WOW... You all can really "debate". I talked to my student and we both agree, he was not current, qualified. He was not current in 3 takeoffs and landings in last 90 days and therefore can not fly with a non instructor and legally log it with passengers, in my opinion and my...

This Forum is full of paganizing people. I am brushed up. Sole manipulator of controls for plane they are qualified (cat and class) and current. At the point he flew he was NOT CURRENT, had not flown in 90 days and there were others on board.