Search results

Straight to jail.

According to Wiki, "Much of the holding has been superseded by more recent cases and changes in the regulations relied upon.[3]" "Branning v. United States, 654 F.2d 88 (Fed. Cir. 1981)".

So you want a perfect answer instead of Oh here we go. :lol::rolleyes:

Same thing I did.

In many of these places, there are no roads anymore, so what good does driving around the sign do them?

I've heard of Ryan McBeth for years but have never watched his videos. Pretty good rundown from his perspective:

https://pilotsofamerica.com/community/threads/pilot-threatened-with-arrest-for-helping-nc-victims-of-hurricane-helene-excuse-me.148854/

That's been standard for years, and that's specifically about filing a claim for reimbursement of expenses such as hotels, lost food from power outages, etc. How else are people supposed to make claims?

Considering there aren't roads anymore in some of these areas, probably some truth to it, except it would be local law enforcement, not FEMA.

Because it seems pretty clearly to be a competitor to the 172.

Juuuust a bit outside.

Why are we comparing a P2010 to a 182?

Or here, with a nifty drag and drop map system to get a model sounding anywhere you want...

Forecast skew-t models available here: https://www.weather.gov/zse/ModelSounding

Still available here: https://www.spc.noaa.gov/exper/soundings/

Whoosh.

Unless I'm mistaken they don't supervise or sign off anything, they're just a middleman to help you find a competent shop and act as your agent.

Sounds like clickbait ******** from the title.

See Salty's post about losing gps on top of a layer.

Alaska flying is absolutely in my future when I get back from OCONUS. Want to use some of that GI Bill monies to get my floatplane ratings, but will have to settle for something on wheels to get in the door up there.