My thoughts exactly. Seems redundant and unnecessarily redundant. Putting VHF into a UHF, and vice versa, gives an invalid message and won’t tune.Huh. Well, I guess someone might confuse 123.0 for a UHF frequency, but you’d think that the folks flying planes with UHF radios wouldn’t do that.
It’s reduntantly repeating something that’s already been said before.. Seems redundant and unnecessarily redundant.
Given that the difference between UHF and VHF is the frequency, I hope that nobody thought it was necessary to tell people that 123.45 is a VHF frequency. The valid reason to do something like this would be to make it easier and faster to find the frequency he needs based on whether he wants UHF or VHF. But I don't think appending a V or U on the end of the number accomplishes that.I have it from a reliable source that it does stand for VHF.
Why is another question.
I agree. The only explanation I got wasGiven that the difference between UHF and VHF is the frequency, I hope that nobody thought it was necessary to tell people that 123.45 is a VHF frequency. The valid reason to do something like this would be to make it easier and faster to find the frequency he needs based on whether he wants UHF or VHF. But I don't think appending a V or U on the end of the number accomplishes that.
I agree. The only explanation I got was
"This notation was recently added to ForeFlight's airport frequency listings to help pilots quickly identify VHF frequencies."
Which still leaves me wondering why.
Clearly not. One thing ForeFlight could do better is getting rid of the V after every VHF radio frequency.Has FF hit the end of the road for things it could do better?
And? Did he accidentally try to tune the UHF radio to 135.02 but for Foreflight having a V after the frequency?
Check out radio panel lower left.
And? Did he accidentally try to tune the UHF radio to 135.02 but for Foreflight having a V after the frequency?
No, bút uhf is still in a few planes. Thank goodness they put the vhf in there too.