Anyone else building a wood airplane?

Mine has an O-235-L2C and no wing tanks. It burns about 5.5 GPH, leaving me with about 90 mins of endurance with legal VFR reserves. I'm ready to get out and stretch by then, anyway, especially if it's midday and I'm getting bounced around. Needs a pilot upgrade more than anything else. :biggrin:
Interesting. Dave Hertner told me I really needed to keep the engine weight at or under 200#, I’d have thought an O-235 would be too heavy. Then again there are several running Rotecs, so maybe it’s not as big a deal as that.
 
Not sure why that would be - I've seen several powered by O-235s and O-290s. I'm a large pilot - about 275 lbs - and I still have over 200 lbs of useful load remaining. With me sitting in the rear hole, the airplane's CG was about an inch aft of the allowable limit prescribed by the Fisher literature, so I replaced the previous owner's 23lb AGM battery and stainless tray with it a Shorai lithium battery and an aluminum mount. In my case, a heavier engine would have been helpful.
 
Hats off to you woodworkers! My grandfather had big dreams of building a Falco. Gorgeous design and a lot of work. I have his set of preview plans somewhere. He started accumulating woodworking tools and honing his skills on more forgiving projects, but grandma's cancer turned out to be a permanent detour from his dreams.
 
Not sure why that would be - I've seen several powered by O-235s and O-290s. I'm a large pilot - about 275 lbs - and I still have over 200 lbs of useful load remaining. With me sitting in the rear hole, the airplane's CG was about an inch aft of the allowable limit prescribed by the Fisher literature, so I replaced the previous owner's 23lb AGM battery and stainless tray with it a Shorai lithium battery and an aluminum mount. In my case, a heavier engine would have been helpful.
You win the prize for the most useful reply from anyone that I've had in a month, at least. I can't even calculate the odds of finding someone who is equal to my own not insubstantial bulk who's flying a Celebrity. I've been looking at small Continentals and some other alternatives, and knowing that an O-235 or -290 would be a viable option is great news. I've never actually seen a Celebrity in person...
 
Closing in on completing Wing #2 (lower right). All that remains is the leading edge scallops and routing the lower edge of the aileron. Oh, and cutting the bushings and bolting in all the attaching brackets, and varnish, and... OK, whatever.

Now to decide whether to build the top wings next, or take a break and build the tail or something.
 
You are set up for making wings, keep doing it till they are done, then move onto the next group. Don’t break the rhythm or you will loose time getting back into it.
 
You are set up for making wings, keep doing it till they are done, then move onto the next group. Don’t break the rhythm or you will loose time getting back into it.
Probably will. The last two should go a lot quicker than the first two anyway. The first one was all learning curve, plus making all the wingtips. The next had the wing walk. Bet I can knock out the other two in less than half the time.
 
What do you think of the build compared to the RV? I scratch built a sonex and will one day build something else when lofe slows down ahain. I like the idea of a wooden airplane but wasn't sure how much harder it was than an aluminum riveted structure.

The sonex has the same 200lb fwfr weight limit. If you aren't stuck on a certified engine the VW, Corvair, Jabiru, and Rotax engines can all come in under that limit.
 
What do you think of the build compared to the RV? I scratch built a sonex and will one day build something else when lofe slows down ahain. I like the idea of a wooden airplane but wasn't sure how much harder it was than an aluminum riveted structure.

The sonex has the same 200lb fwfr weight limit. If you aren't stuck on a certified engine the VW, Corvair, Jabiru, and Rotax engines can all come in under that limit.
The build experience is completely different in every possible way. For me especially, since I’m building from plans (wing kit notwithstanding; the precut parts are not really saving much time or work as most aren’t at best an approximation of what they should be).

Obviously the materials and construction are different, but aside from that you’re working from plans sheets with not a lot more than general “Do this first, then that” kind of directions.

It’s a lot quieter, with no rivet gun or air drill. Personally I find it a more relaxed, more enjoyable build process. When I was working on the RV, I knew every imperfection would be visible. On this one, I know it’s all going to be sanded, filled if I need to fill, and covered. I really like working with wood, and sawdust doesn’t scratch things up like aluminum shavings.

I don’t know that I’d say either one is a faster or slower build, just way different. You can buy kits, parts, etc. - or at least you could when it was FFP, not sure now that CKD has taken over. I don’t know for sure what I’ll do when it comes time for an engine mount, fuel tank, etc.

Like building an AL plane, I think most people would be able to do it. There’s no special magic to cutting and gluing wood, any more that there is to pulling or bucking rivets. A little practice and you’re on your way. T88 epoxy is pretty forgiving and stronger than the wood.
 
There is something (to me anyway) special about building airplanes with wood, it’s an organic material, each piece is a little different in its grain even if cut from the same board, orienting it in it’s optimized way, the smell when you cut it, it’s more like creating something that should be named when you’re done, rather than assembling a machine out of metal parts. It’s different, and can only really be fully understood by doing it.
 
Back
Top