Plane loaded with drugs makes emergency landing on Southern California highway

PIC identified as 21-year-old CFI (Breit). Second occupant (Smith), 36-year-old, identified as a passenger in some news reports and a student pilot in others. Media briefing indicated that the passenger was the backpack tosser as well as the holder of the on-person drugs.

Possible the CFI was unwitting? Oceanside police apparently don’t think so as both charged.
 
AquaLand said:
Possible the CFI was unwitting? Oceanside police apparently don’t think so as both charged.
Click to expand...
That doesn’t mean they don’t think it’s possible. It could mean they are bumping it up for a higher authority to decide.
 
Maybe they ran out of fuel because they were speeding?
 
AquaLand said:
PIC identified as 21-year-old CFI (Breit). Second occupant (Smith), 36-year-old, identified as a passenger in some news reports and a student pilot in others. Media briefing indicated that the passenger was the backpack tosser as well as the holder of the on-person drugs.

Possible the CFI was unwitting? Oceanside police apparently don’t think so as both charged.
Click to expand...
Pretty typical for all occupants of a vehicle to be charged when drugs are found. If one of the people charged really didn't know about it, that will hopefully come out in court, if it gets that far.
 
Half Fast said:
"One kilogram!" would have been a much better answer. :)
Click to expand...
Kilogram is a unit of mass, not weight. While giving it in pounds was the most helpful way to answer, if he really wanted to show off, he could have said 9.8 Newtons. :biggrin:
 
Half Fast said:
Actually that would have been a great opportunity to explain that kilogram is a unit of mass, not weight, and that the weight depends upon the local gravity.
Click to expand...
So, any other questions?
 
172andyou said:
And get arrested for unsafe dropping of objects from an airplane!
Click to expand...
It depends, right? You can drop things if they don't create a hazard to persons or property. But who determines if there's a hazard? I was involved in dropping hundreds of paratroopers. Seems like a "hazard to persons." <g>
 
Cocaine might be considered hazardous to humans. Just ask Rick James.
 
AquaLand said:
PIC identified as 21-year-old CFI (Breit). Second occupant (Smith), 36-year-old, identified as a passenger in some news reports and a student pilot in others. Media briefing indicated that the passenger was the backpack tosser as well as the holder of the on-person drugs.

Possible the CFI was unwitting? Oceanside police apparently don’t think so as both charged.
Click to expand...
Passenger shows up on airmen registry as student pilot. I wouldn't be surprised if the CFI was aware....knowing what they get paid.

They landed in Mesa just before sunset. Then took off 4 hours later at 11:09pm. Seems both occupants were probably aware
 
Last edited:
Dana said:
Pretty typical for all occupants of a vehicle to be charged when drugs are found. If one of the people charged really didn't know about it, that will hopefully come out in court, if it gets that far.
Click to expand...
Depends on location. My area won’t typically charge anyone except the driver, unless there’s something indicating it was in the specific possession of the passenger. Constructive possession isn’t a thing here, at least in my county.

Actually, they don’t seem to charge anyone with anything, but that’s a different rabbit hole…
 
If flying drugs, maybe try 2:00 in the afternoon rather than 2:00 A.M., less suspicious. Don’t forget to properly fuel the plane.
 
Half Fast said:
Pretty easy to forget little details when you're stoned.....
Click to expand...
If someone is using the product they’re transporting and their “management” finds out, an emergency landing is going to be the least of their concerns…
 
Dana said:
If you make an emergency landing, they're gonna poke around the plane. Not sure about the legality of that. When I made my forced landing, while I was talking to the cops out near the road they went through the plane and dumped all my bags out, I never did find some of the small items that rolled away. They didn't ask me or say anything about it, or that they had looked, I just found the mess when I walked back to the plane.
Click to expand...
That's just crappy, I feel like it's understandable why they would WANT to look, seeing it as an aviation incident, but still the legality of that seems just obnoxious. Then again, I guess seeing a plane on the side of the road could be probable cause lol
 
Dana said:
If you make an emergency landing, they're gonna poke around the plane. Not sure about the legality of that. When I made my forced landing, while I was talking to the cops out near the road they went through the plane and dumped all my bags out, I never did find some of the small items that rolled away. They didn't ask me or say anything about it, or that they had looked, I just found the mess when I walked back to the plane.
Click to expand...

looters?
 
The article I read said one of the occupants was observed throwing a backpack into the woods. In addition to the drug charge, they got them on littering.
 
Leaned Mixture said:
That's just crappy, I feel like it's understandable why they would WANT to look, seeing it as an aviation incident, but still the legality of that seems just obnoxious.
Click to expand...
I don't know that it was legal. I just wasn't going to argue about it; I was busy explaining that no, it wasn't OK to cut the wings off with a chainsaw to remove it from the field.
Bob Noel said:
looters?
Click to expand...
No, it was the cops, while I was about 500 feet away talking to other cops.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top